• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Магистратура 2019/2020

Управление интеллектуальной собственностью

Направление: 38.04.02. Менеджмент
Когда читается: 2-й курс, 1 модуль
Формат изучения: Full time
Прогр. обучения: Управление в сфере науки, технологий и инноваций
Язык: английский
Кредиты: 3

Программа дисциплины

Аннотация

Intellectual property rights are a means of protecting the use of inventions, technologies and knowledge for the party holding such right. Increasingly for companies but also research based institutions like universities and public research institutions the question arises which knowledge and inventions to protect against other parties use, in which geographic scope, in which application fields etc. to aim at such protection. Also the issue becomes crucial which share of knowledge and technology to protect measured against the overall knowledge and intellectual assets available. Furthermore the question arises how to evaluate intellectual property and how to determine the contribution of intellectual property to economic value in tradable goods. The course gives an introduction into the management of intellectual property by means of intellectual property rights. A variety of types of intellectual rights are discussed in a strategic company context, e.g. from the view of intellectual property as strategic weapons for the holder and owner of intellectual property. Special attention is given to the valuation of intellectual property and portfolio management approaches.
Цель освоения дисциплины

Цель освоения дисциплины

  • Creating informed judgment for intellectual property policy decisions to foster an innovative economy on company, regional and national level;
  • Setting standards for monitoring intellectual property policies in support of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI).
Результаты освоения дисциплины

Результаты освоения дисциплины

  • Apply assessment approaches to royalty negotiations
  • Build and defend the approach to the type of IP exploitation in frame of specific project
  • Critically analyse the process of creating strategy IPR families on corporate, national and international levels
  • Deacribe the approaches to technical and newness assessment of invention disclosures and apply the reporting guidelines for invention disclosures
  • Describe the difference between inventorship and ownership, explain the core of the inventor compensation law
  • Explain the difference between types of IPR with specifics of national regulations and special conditions
  • Explain the principal approaches to financial assessment of IPR portfolios
  • Explain the principles of choosing strategy for IP protection, apply the factors of regional scope and claim scope to the choice of protection
  • Explain the role of IPR for R&D&I management, and nature of IP and its history
  • Provide comparative analisys of defense strategies
Содержание учебной дисциплины

Содержание учебной дисциплины

  • Meaning of IPR in innovation management
  • Typology of IPR
  • Inventorship. Ownership. Service works
  • IP agreements. Invention disclosure systems assessment
  • Strategies for protecting IP
  • Defending intellectual property rights
  • Assessment and valuation of IP
  • Auditing intellectual property right portfolios
  • Building and managing portfolios of IP
  • IP exploitation and use strategies
Элементы контроля

Элементы контроля

  • Exam (неблокирующий)
  • Class assignment (неблокирующий)
  • Home task (неблокирующий)
Промежуточная аттестация

Промежуточная аттестация

  • Промежуточная аттестация (1 модуль)
    0.25 * Home task + 0.25 * Class assignment + 0.5 * Exam
Список литературы

Список литературы

Рекомендуемая основная литература

  • Bader, M. A. (2006). Intellectual Property Management in R&D Collaborations : The Case of the Service Industry Sector. Heidelberg: Physica. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=176604
  • Choi, T. Y., Budny, J., & Wank, N. (2004). Intellectual property management: a knowledge supply chain perspective. Business Horizons, (1), 37. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.a.eee.bushor.v47y2004i1p37.44
  • Frank, S. J. (2006). Intellectual Property for Managers and Investors : A Guide to Evaluating, Protecting and Exploiting IP. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=148150
  • Junghans, C., & Levy, A. (2006). Intellectual Property Management : A Guide for Scientists, Engineers, Financiers, and Managers. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=228339

Рекомендуемая дополнительная литература

  • Bronwyn H. Hall. (2007). Patents and patent policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, (4), 568. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm037
  • Carol A. Corrado, Charles R. Hulten, & Daniel E. Sichel. (2006). Intangible Capital and Economic Growth. NBER Working Papers. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.p.nbr.nberwo.11948
  • Gilbert, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. G. (1982). Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly. American Economic Review, 72(3), 514. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=bsu&AN=4504617
  • Gilbert, R., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Optimal Patent Length And Breadth. Papers. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.p.fth.priwdp.28
  • Lanjouw, J. O. (1998). Patent Protection in the Shadow of Infringement: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.7BD5699B
  • Loikkanen, T., Konttinen, J., Hyvönen, J., Ruotsalainen, L., Tuominen, K., Waris, M., … Ilmarinen, O. (2009). Acquisition, Utilisation and the Impact of Patent and Market Information on Innovation Activities. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.55A39141
  • Michael L. Katz, & Carl Shapiro. (1985). On the Licensing of Innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, (4), 504. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.a.rje.randje.v16y1985iwinterp504.520
  • Sabourin, D., Baldwin, J. R., & Hanel, P. (2000). Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights. Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.p.stc.stcp3e.2000122e
  • Wesley M Cohen, Richard R Nelson, & John P Walsh. (2003). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not). Levine’s Working Paper Archive. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.p.cla.levarc.618897000000000624