Научно-исследовательский семинар

Магистратура 2019/2020

Статус: Курс обязательный (Политика. Экономика. Философия)

Направление: 41.04.04. Политология

Кто читает: Департамент теоретической экономики

Где читается: Факультет социальных наук

Когда читается: 2-й курс, 1-3 модуль

Формат изучения: без онлайн-курса

Преподаватели: Розенберг Дина Яновна, Фомин Иван Владленович

Прогр. обучения: Политика. Экономика. Философия

Язык: английский

Кредиты: 5

Контактные часы: 68

Full Syllabus

Abstract

This course is based on prior knowledge obtained by students during the study of the following disciplines:  Categories of Political Science  Comparative Politics  Policy Analysis  Economics The broad goal of this course is to sharpen students’ theoretical and methodological skills, discuss with them how to choose an adequate research design, and develop critical thinking in general. The narrow goal of the course is to help students reach high quality of their MA theses and structure their research process. We will achieve these goals by introducing to students the latest mainstream works from the leading international journals in Political Science and Comparative Political Economy. We will discuss them in terms of theory and research design. Why some countries are stuck in technological backwardness, while others prosper? Why in some countries 2 people enjoy longer and healthier lives? What is the role of political institutions in answering these questions? Are bureaucrats motivated by ideology or career concerns? Also, we will introduce today’s hot topics in Political Science and tie them to the current events. What role does Internet play in contemporary social movements? Does social media help overcome collective action problem or just disseminate more information? Who are trolls and how they manipulate public opinion? Why far rights are gaining their momentum? Why did “the efficient secret” of the UK Parliament disappear when it came to Brexit? Along answering these theoretical questions, we will touch upon the empirical concerns (endogeneity problems, null-hypothesis testing in frequentist models) and their possible solutions: instrumental variables, research discontinuity design, Bayesian analysis).

Learning Objectives

The main goal of this course is to familiarize students with the current trends in political science referring to key publications of recent years in academic journals which are most in demand among the professional community of political scientists. The course is aimed at developing students' critical thinking skills, it introduces them modern research methods (instrumental variables, research discontinuity design, Bayesian statistics), and also serves the purpose of forming students' standards of modern research work in the field of political science. The proposed forms of knowledge control are also aimed at improving the skills of writing critical referee reports based on the arguments presented in the articles under consideration.

Expected Learning Outcomes

A student is able to differentiate different types of social studies, forms adequate expectations about its strengths and weaknesses. S/he is aware of the differences between natural and social sciences, knows basic epistemological strategies, applied in political science and economics
A student understands mechanisms through which objective knowledge and ideological preconceptions are interconnected; knows of possible errors in concept formation leading to wrong generalizations; applies rules and norms of professional ethics regulating behaviour of a researcher facing value-based challenges.
A student is able to develop a research proposal
A student is able to develop a research paper and prepare its public presentation
A student is able to differentiate different approaches to public policy design and strategy development. S/he knows principles and methods of growth diagnostics applied in development studies, international experiences with assessment and implementation of large-scale projects, role of interdisciplinary approach in such cases, ways of its realization
A student is able to develop an outline of a research paper

Course Contents

Introduction to Epistemology of Social Sciences
Social, political, and economic domains. Gemeinschaft/Gessellschaft distinction. Variety of research types the social studies. Friedman’s methodological essay as an expression of positivist influence in the social sciences. Search for specific methodology of social inquire: the cases of Durkheim and Max Weber. Modeling in the social sciences: the current state of debates.
Value Judgments in Social Sciences
Popper – Adorno debate on the logic of the social sciences. Social studies and ideology: Schumpeter’s and Max Weber’s perspectives. Concept formation and misformation. Truth-seeking and relativism in social research. Professional ethics of a social scientist in a post-truth world
Social Change: Diagnostics and Design
Rational modeling versus “muddling through” approach in public policy design. Strategic planning and strategic thinking. Growth diagnostics: principles and cases. Development projects: challenges and interdisciplinary responses.
Developing term-works literature reviews
Literature review: selection and focusing. Choice of methods. Class discussions.
Preparation of term-works
Text structuring. References and citations. Term-works pre-defenses.
Developing term-work proposals
Purpose and structure. Formulation of a topic. Class discussions.

Assessment Elements

Participation
Quizzes
Summaries
1 page which should include: research question, causal inference, hypothesis, results.
Literature Review
Referee Reports
Students can choose any research article (non-journalistic) for review from both the required and additional literature. Referee reports should not exceed 3 pages, 12 Times New Roman, double spacing. The reports are expected to provide a meaningful, detailed analysis of the article (strengths and weaknesses, valid criticism, suggestions for improvement), as well as the students’ opinion on the topic. A review in the format of a brief retelling of the article will not be evaluated. Only ONE review can be written on one topic
Defense
Upon receipt of an unsatisfactory grade for the first retake, the student is entitled to a second attempt. In this case, all materials will be evaluated by a commission of three people.

Interim Assessment

Interim assessment (3 module)
0.3 * Defense + 0.15 * Literature Review + 0.2 * Participation + 0.05 * Quizzes + 0.15 * Referee Reports + 0.15 * Summaries

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.CAA2734F
Albert O. Hirschman. (2011). Development Projects Observed. [N.p.]: Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=2024537
Boudon, R. (2003). The Social Sciences and the Two Types of Relativism. Comparative Sociology, 2(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913303100418861
Colander, D. (2005). From Muddling Through to the Economics of Control: Views of Applied Policy from J. N. Keynes to Abba Lerner. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.9ABF958F
Dieguez, S. (2017). Post-Truth: The Dark Side of the Brain. Scientific American Mind, 28(5), 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamericanmind0917-43
Eco, U., Farina, G., & Mongiat Farina, C. (2015). How to Write a Thesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=963778
Emile Durkheim, & Steven Lukes. (2014). The Rules of Sociological Method : And Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. [N.p.]: Free Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1963188
Erik Angner. (2006). Economists as experts: Overconfidence in theory and practice. Journal of Economic Methodology, (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780600566271
Hausman, D. M. (2008). The Philosophy of Economics. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.b.cup.cbooks.9780521709842
Lindblom, C. E. (2010). The Science of “Muddling” Through. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 12(1), 70–80. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=bsu&AN=51783676
Morgenbesser, L. (2014). Elections in Hybrid Regimes: Conceptual Stretching Revived. Political Studies, 62(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12020
Nabrendorf, R. O. (1949). Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences. American Sociological Review, 14(6), 821–822. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086694
Ricardo Hausmann, Bailey Klinger, & Rodrigo Wagner. (2008). Doing Growth Diagnostics in Practice: A “Mindbook.” CID Working Papers. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.p.cid.wpfacu.177
Rickman, H. P. (1976). The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology (Book). British Journal of Sociology, 27(4), 509–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/590190
Rodrik, D. (2015). Economics Rules : Why Economics Works, When It Fails, and How To Tell The Difference. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1052377
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review, (04), 1033. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.a.cup.apsrev.v64y1970i04p1033.1053.13
Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Science and Ideology. American Economic Review, 39(2), 345–359. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=bsu&AN=8728687
Sugden, R. (2000). Credible worlds: the status of theoretical models in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 7(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017800362220
The Washington consensus reconsidered : towards a new global governance / ed. by Narcís Serra . (2008). Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.273311514
Wachs, M. (2018). Bent Flyvbjerg, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017). 600 pp. $150.00 (cloth), ISBN: 9780198732242. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 816–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12984
Weber, M., & Tribe, K. (2019). Economy and Society : A New Translation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=2012211

Recommended Additional Bibliography

Alacevich, M. (2012). Visualizing Uncertainties, or how Albert Hirschman and the World Bank disagreed on project appraisal and development approaches. Policy Research Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.p.wbk.wbrwps.6260
Aleskerov, F. (2009). How to Prepare and Write a Thesis? Advices to PhD and Ms Students in Economics Studies. Journal of the New Economic Association, (3–4), 248. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.a.nea.journl.y2009i3.4p248.258
Ariel Rubinstein. (n.d.). 2006): “Dilemmas of an economic theorist. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.2D2E28AA
Axel Leijonhufvud. (1973). Life Among The Econ. Economic Inquiry, (3), 327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1973.tb01065.x
Blaug,Mark. (1997). Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.b.cup.cbooks.9780521577014
DeMartino, G. F., & McCloskey, D. N. (2018). Professional Ethics 101: A Reply to Anne Krueger’s Review of The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics. Econ Journal Watch, 15(1), 4–19. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=bsu&AN=128779271
Giovanni Sartori. (1991). Comparing and Miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, (3), 243. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.a.sae.jothpo.v3y1991i3p243.257
Gordon, S. (1991). The History and Philosophy of Social Science. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=77205
Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2013). The Atlas of Economic Complexity : Mapping Paths to Prosperity (Vol. Updated edition). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=686113
I. Gilboa, A. Postlewaite, L. Samuelson, & D. Schmeidler. (2015). Economic Models as Analogies. VOPROSY ECONOMIKI. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.a.nos.voprec.2015.04.6
Karl Marx. (2011). Capital (Volume 1: A Critique of Political Economy) : A Critique of Political Economy). [N.p.]: Digireads.com Publishing. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1536502
Mäki, U. (2009). The Methodology of Positive Economics : Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=279902
Marx, K., Arthur, C. J., & Engels, F. (2001). The German Ideology. London: Electric Book Co. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=476798
Murray, R. (2011). How to Write a Thesis (Vol. 3rd ed). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=375106
Rodrik, D. (DE-588)121942325, (DE-576)164981713. (2007). One economics, many recipes : globalization, institutions, and economic growth / Dani Rodrik. Princeton [u.a.]: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.26523039X
Stenmark, M., Fuller, S., & Zackariasson, U. (2018). Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society : Possibilities and Challenges. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1897308
Zamora Bonilla, J. P., & Jarvie, I. C. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=509313

Course Syllabus