- Have • an understanding of problems in contemporary philosophy Know • the concepts of Morality, Knowledge, Epistemology, Metaphysics • modern approach to the problems presented in this course Be able • to give a grounded opinion on the topics presented in this course • to criticize constructively and determine existing issues in philosophical theories
- -Be able to give definitions to Objectivism, Relativism and Emotivism -To know Objections to Objectivism, Relativism and Emotivism
- -Be able to give definition to knowledge, radical skepticism -Be able to present and discuss the concept of Gettier Problem
- -Be able to present the concept of Political Obligation -Be able to give definitions of Gratitude and Benefit
- -Be able to present main ideas of David Hume, Thomas Reid and Immanuel Kant
- -To know concepts of Ptolemeic Astronomy, Galileo and Copernican Astronomy -Be able to give definitions to Scientific Realism and Scientific Anti-Realism
- -be able to give definitions to Determinism, Libertarianism, Compatibilism, Hard Determinism
- -be able to give definitions to Causal Loop -be able to present concepts of Grandfather Paradoxes
- -To know distinctive aims and methods of philosophy -Be able to give definitions to philosophy
- Week 1: What is Philosophy?We’ll start the course by thinking about what Philosophy actually is: what makes it different from other subjects? What are its distinctive aims and methods? We'll also think about why the questions that philosophers attempt to answer are often thought to be both fundamental and important, and have a look at how philosophy is actually practiced. Finally, we'll briefly touch upon two very influential philosophers' answers to the question of how we can know whether, in any given case, there really is a right way of thinking about things. This week materials consist of 4 videos, 3 pieces of material for self-study and 2 tests.
- Week 2 Topic 1: Morality: Objective, Relative or Emotive? Topic 2: What is Knowledge? And Do We Have Any?We all live with some sense of what is good or bad, some feelings about which ways of conducting ourselves are better or worse. But what is the status of these moral beliefs, senses, or feelings? Should we think of them as reflecting hard, objective facts about our world, of the sort that scientists could uncover and study? Or should we think of moral judgements as mere expressions of personal or cultural preferences? In this module we’ll survey some of the different options that are available when we’re thinking about these issues, and the problems and prospects for each. We know a lot of things – or, at least, we think we do. Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that studies knowledge; what it is, and the ways we can come to have it. In this module, we’ll take a tour through some of the issues that arise in this branch of philosophy. In particular, we’ll think about what radical scepticism means for our claims to knowledge. How can we know something is the case if we’re unable to rule out possibilities that are clearly incompatible with it?
- Week 3 Topic 1: Do We Have an Obligation to Obey the Law? Topic 2: Should You Believe What You Hear?The laws of a state govern what we can and cannot do within that state. But do we have an obligation to obey those laws? In this module, we'll discuss this question, together with some of the main positions that philosophers have developed in response to it. We'll start off by examining what obeying the law means exactly. Then we'll look at three factors that might form the basis of an obligation to follow the law. Finally, we'll discuss what the consequences might be if the problem can't be solved. Much of what we think about the world we believe on the basis of what other people say. But is this trust in other people's testimony justified? In this module, we’ll investigate how this question was addressed by two great philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, David Hume (1711 - 1776) and Thomas Reid (1710 - 1796). Hume and Reid's dispute about testimony represents a clash between two worldviews that would continue to clash for centuries: a skeptical and often secular worldview, eager to question everything (represented by Hume), and a conservative and often religious worldview, keen to defend common sense (represented by Reid).
- Week 4 Topic 1: Minds, Brains and Computers Topic 2: Are Scientific Theories True?If you’re reading this, then you’ve got a mind. But what is a mind, and what does it take to have one? Should we understand minds as sets of dispositions to behave in certain ways, as patterns of neural activation, or as akin to programmes that are run on the computational hardware of our brains? In this module, we’ll look at how and why recent philosophy of mind and psychology has embraced each of these options in turn, and think about the problems and prospects for each. In this module we will explore a central and ongoing debate in contemporary philosophy of science: whether or not scientific theories are true. Or better, whether a scientific theory needs to be 'true' to be good at all. The answer to this question comes in two main varieties. Scientific realists believe that theories ought to be true in order to be good. We will analyse their main argument for this claim (which goes under the name of 'no miracles argument'), and some prominent objections to it. Scientific antirealists, on the other hand, defend the view that there is nothing special about 'truth' and that scientific theories and scientific progress can be understood without appeal to it. The aim of this session is to present both views, their main arguments, and prospects.
- Week 5 Topic 1: Do We Have Free Will and Does It Matter? Topic 2: Time Travel and PhilosophyWe typically feel that the actions that we make are the result of our own free choices. But what if those actions are simply the end result of a long chain of cause and effect? What does this mean for free will? In this module, we'll look at the concept of determinism. In particular, we'll consider the implications that determinism might have for the notion of free will. In this module we'll think about some issues in metaphysics, a branch of philosophy that investigates the ways that reality could intelligibly be. Our case study will be the possibility, or otherwise, of time-travel. Some have thought that the apparent possibility of creating a machine that we could use to transport a person backwards in time can be ruled out just by thinking about it. But is time-travel really logically impossible? What would the universe have to be like for it to be possible? And can we know whether our universe fits the bill?
- Final testИтоговый тест сдается и оценки выставляются на платформе http://miem.hse.ru/ в среде Classroom.
- Oral control
- Chrisman, M., & Pritchard, D. (2017). Philosophy for Everyone (Vol. Second edition). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1286862
- Philosophy: the Basics / Warburton, N — London: Routledge, 2012. — 200 с. — ISBN: 9781317813026. — URL: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hselibrary-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1356359&query=philosophy+reader (дата обращения: 30.08.2019). — Текст : электронный.
- Psillos, S. (2007). Philosophy of Science A-Z. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=194151
- Boucher, G. (2017). Rethinking the Enlightenment : Between History, Philosophy, and Politics. Lanham: Lexington Books. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1684138
- Childers, T. (2013). Philosophy and Probability. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=656579
- Christian, A., Hommen, D., Retzlaff, N., & Schurz, G. (2018). Philosophy of Science : Between the Natural Sciences, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities. [N.p.]: Springer. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1743450
- Касавин И.Т. ред - Эпистемология и философия науки / Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2016. Т. XLVII. №1 - КноРус - 2016 - 240с. - ISBN: 9771811833002 - Текст электронный // ЭБС BOOKRU - URL: https://book.ru/book/920675