• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
  • HSE University
  • Student Theses
  • Participation of Populist Radical Right Parties in Coalition Governments in the Post-Socialist States of Central and Eastern Europe in 2000-2019: Do National Party Systems Matter?

Participation of Populist Radical Right Parties in Coalition Governments in the Post-Socialist States of Central and Eastern Europe in 2000-2019: Do National Party Systems Matter?

Student: Viatkin Ilia

Supervisor: Anna A. Dekalchuk

Faculty: Saint-Petersburg School of Social Sciences

Educational Programme: Political Science and World Politics (Bachelor)

Final Grade: 10

Year of Graduation: 2021

Albeit the research on populist radical right parties (PRRPs) in European democracies is truly multi-faceted, an explanation of how these parties get into government has so far received limited scholarly attention. Furthermore, extant studies relying on the classic actor-centered theories of coalition formation overlook the specifics of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and, therefore, yield mediocre explanatory capacity. In turn, our paper explores the conditions of PRRPs’ cabinet inclusion in CEE from the perspective of a structural factor of the national party systems. We employ means of a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine 34 instances of coalition government formation in 11 CEE states during 2000–2019. Empirical findings identify the low level of clustering and the presence of centrifugal tendencies in the party system as necessary conditions for PRRPs’ cabinet participation. Being combined with the idiosyncratic conjunctions of other factors, above all the high salience of the GAL–TAN cleavage and the high polarization on immigration or European integration, they produce four constellations of party system features, facilitating PRRPs’ ascension to the government. Two of them emphasize the crucial role of the numerical dimension of a party system while the rest two accentuate ideology-related factors. A similar distinction is applicable to the interpretation of configurations of party system features that prevent PRRPs’ involvement, accentuating the role of the high level of clustering, large center-right party, and ideological non-congruence between PRR and formateur parties. The mechanisms of PRRPs’ government participation are further refined through the post-QCA deviant case studies.

Full text (added May 16, 2021)

Student Theses at HSE must be completed in accordance with the University Rules and regulations specified by each educational programme.

Summaries of all theses must be published and made freely available on the HSE website.

The full text of a thesis can be published in open access on the HSE website only if the authoring student (copyright holder) agrees, or, if the thesis was written by a team of students, if all the co-authors (copyright holders) agree. After a thesis is published on the HSE website, it obtains the status of an online publication.

Student theses are objects of copyright and their use is subject to limitations in accordance with the Russian Federation’s law on intellectual property.

In the event that a thesis is quoted or otherwise used, reference to the author’s name and the source of quotation is required.

Search all student theses