• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Public policy as a ground for refusal to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards and court decisions

Student: Savelyeva Evgeniya

Supervisor: Vladislav Starzhenetsky

Faculty: Faculty of Law

Educational Programme: Law of International Trade, Finance and Economic Integration (Master)

Year of Graduation: 2021

In our contemporary world the line between “international”, “national” and “foreign” have been becoming more and more blurred. This made international arbitration and dispute resolution in foreign courts more accessible and more popular for regular legal entities. However, when two different legislations meet, it is possible that they would contradict each other. In order to protect most valued principles of national legislations the concept of public policy was introduced. This concept does not have its own crystalized definition which allows national legislations to freely interpret it. And this is the main advantage and disadvantage of it. From one point of view, it allows to define what principles are important for each country with the basis on their national features. However, at the same time this understanding allows for the very chaotic interpretation. The preset thesis is dedicated to the issue of interpretation of the public policy concept in Russian legislation. Russian legislation provides for the quite narrow understanding of the public policy concept. However, in practice such understanding can be turned upside down. Thus, the main aim of the present work is focused on resolving such issue. In order to resolve it the present thesis is focused on finding roots of the raised problem, analyzes historical, theoretical frameworks, encompasses the comparative analysis of application in different jurisdictions, raises questions of rationality of the Russian approach. The main hypothesis of the present work is that the mentioned problem can be cured in two ways. Firstly, it is needed to distinguish between the public policy and other grounds to deny enforcement. It is important to understand that the public policy is an “emergency break” for most exceptional situations. Secondly, it is needed to include regulations for different kinds of disputes, which would provide concrete tests that a court would need to apply in order to access all needed circumstances.

Student Theses at HSE must be completed in accordance with the University Rules and regulations specified by each educational programme.

Summaries of all theses must be published and made freely available on the HSE website.

The full text of a thesis can be published in open access on the HSE website only if the authoring student (copyright holder) agrees, or, if the thesis was written by a team of students, if all the co-authors (copyright holders) agree. After a thesis is published on the HSE website, it obtains the status of an online publication.

Student theses are objects of copyright and their use is subject to limitations in accordance with the Russian Federation’s law on intellectual property.

In the event that a thesis is quoted or otherwise used, reference to the author’s name and the source of quotation is required.

Search all student theses