HSE Hosts Russian National Award in Applied Economics
The winner of the 2018 award is Ina Ganguli, Professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The American researcher stood out for her series of articles analysing the productivity of Russian scientists in the 1990s, as well as their decisions concerning emigration and the impact that emigration had on the diffusion of Russian science in the United States.
The Russian National Award in Applied Economics is given once every two years for outstanding published papers on the Russian economy at the country, industry, regional, or company level. The main purpose of the award is to identify works of high importance for the development of academic research and economics education in Russia, as well as for the increased efficiency of the Russian economy and economic policy.
The founders of the Russian National Award in Applied Economics are the Higher School of Economics, the New Economic School, the Ural Federal University, the Association of Russian Economic Think Tanks, the RAS Institute of World Economy and International Relations, and the business magazine Expert.
Twenty-six papers were submitted to the competition (22 in English and four in Russian), all of which had been published in leading international journals. Sixteen papers made it to the expert evaluation stage. Each of these papers was assessed on a 10-point scale by at least two experts, who included both leading Russian and international scholars. The short list included five candidates, from which a winner and a particularly noteworthy paper were selected.
Ina Ganguli, the award winner, said that she began researching the productivity of Russian scientists in the 1990s and their decisions on emigration as part of her PhD thesis: ‘I was interested in general issues related to transition economies. But when I spent some time in the former USSR and talked to people, it was clear that it was a major shock. I became more interested in what had taken place in Russian science and with human capital during the crisis. I tried to find the factors that led scholars to emigrate, as well as those that helped them stay and do research in Russia’.
According to Alexey Zakharov, member of the Award Academic Committee and Assistant Professor at the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences, Ina Ganguli’s papers record a very painful episode in Russia’s recent history – the crisis of Russian science and the devastating outflow of human capital and research staff abroad. ‘I believe that we’ll be addressing Professor Ganguli’s analysis many times, and not only economists, but everyone interested in contemporary Russian history’, Zakharov believes. ‘I’m very hopeful that Ina will continue her studies related to the impact of various grant systems on research’.
The jury members emphasized the originality, high quality and high ethical standards in data collection as it relates to all the series’ papers, but they noted in particular the article ‘Saving Soviet Science: The Impact of Grants When Government R&D Funding Disappears’. In this paper, Professor Ganguli focuses on the effect of the smaller grants that George Soros’ foundation gave as emergency funding to support scientists amid the sharp decline in state funding for the natural sciences immediately following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The author demonstrated that the Soros Foundation’s payments gave many Russian scholars an opportunity to continue research, instead of leaving for business and other fields. For example, after the funding ended, the scholars who had received grants demonstrated growth in their publication activity.
‘A good imagination and a sense of humour are needed to carry out such a research,’ emphasized Vladimir Gimpelson, Professor in the Faculty of Economic Sciences. ‘The problem is that people don’t make decisions haphazardly. And this selective behaviour doesn’t leave an opportunity to use simple models of analysis in microeconomic studies. It’s very hard to find a control group that would allow us to see what would happen if a certain event didn’t happen’.
But that’s exactly what Ina Ganguli managed to do. She built a model that allowed two very similar groups to be compared. The first were scholars who received grants, and the second were the ones who did not, with the difference between them being insignificant. The difference in the second group was that they didn’t meet one of the grant competitions’ formal requirements. In 1993, the Soros Foundation gave USD 500 to approximately 28,000 scholars each. The requirements for this grant were engaging in theoretical studies and having at least three papers published in peer-reviewed journals over the preceding five years. This means that those who had two papers published within the required period (1988-1993) and one in 1987, for example, were just shy of receiving a grant.
In her article ‘Immigration and Ideas: What Did Russian Scientists “Bring” to the United States?’, the author continued studying Russian scientists’ productivity and showed that the immigration of Russian scientists to the U.S. considerably broadened the familiarity of their American colleagues with scientific works published in Soviet journals, works produced by both the immigrants themselves, as well as other Russian researchers.
The analysis of several databases presented in the paper ‘Who Leaves and Who Stays? Evidence on Immigrant Selection from the Collapse of Soviet Science’ demonstrated that, all else being equal, the likelihood of emigration is higher for men, as well as for younger and more productive scientists.
The jury found particularly noteworthy an article by Denis Ivanov, Research Fellow at the HSE Institute for Industrial and Market Studies, entitled ‘Human Capital and Knowledge-Intensive Industries Location: Evidence from Soviet Legacy in Russia.’
Prof. Dr Thomas Dohmen from the Institute for Applied Microeconomics, University of Bonn, Germany is to deliver an honorary lecture at the upcoming April Academic Conference at HSE University April 9 – 12. HSE News Service spoke with Dr. Dohmen about his work on the Global Preferences Survey (GPS), an international survey of epic proportions that he helped develop and analyze in order to learn whether individuals differ in terms of economic preferences by country, and more.
During the XX April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development, scheduled this year for April 9-12 at the Higher School of Economics, Dr David Garcia of the Complexity Science Hub Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna, Austria will present a report entitled ‘The digital traces of collective emotion’ at a session on ‘The Wellbeing of Children and Youth in the Digital Age.’ Ahead of the conference, Dr Garcia spoke with the HSE News Service about his conference presentation, his research, and plans for ongoing collaboration with HSE colleagues.
Seniors in Russia are not responsive to public promotion of healthy living. Their behaviours follow eight different patterns, and a healthy lifestyle is far from being the most popular one. Only 17% of elderly people live what can be termed a 'healthy' lifestyle, Elena Selezneva discovered. The results of the study were presented at the XIX April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development at HSE.
The report entitled ‘Twelve Solutions for New Education’, prepared by the Higher School of Economics and the Centre for Strategic Development, was presented at the XIX April International Academic Conference. Professors Martin Carnoy and Tomasso Agasisti, international experts on education and conference guests, have shared their views on the issues and initiatives highlighted in the report.
One of the roundtables held during the XIX April Academic Conference featured a discussion of the report on morphology of Russian cities presented by Robert Buckley, Senior Fellow in the Graduate Program in International Affairs at The New School, US. The report looked at what Russian cities look like in terms of population density, how the patterns Russian cities exhibit compare with those of other cities around the world, and what individual behaviours might have contributed to the appearance of a certain pattern.
The notion that Karl Marx's works have been studied inside and out is fundamentally incorrect. The huge body of his manuscripts has still not been completely processed, and his seminal work, Capital, was only recently published with the final edits of the author. The 19th April Conference at the Higher School of Economics included the section ‘Methodology of Economic Science’ which was devoted to the work of the German philosopher and political scientist. Independent researcher and professor from Berlin, Thomas Kuczynski, gave a presentation at the conference which pointed out numerous aspects of Marx’s continuous rethinking of allegedly fixed truths.
During a plenary session of the HSE XIX April International Academic Conference, participants discussed the technological future of the Russian economy and how it relates to objectives such as speeding up economic growth and improving the quality of life.
These days, no scientific research is carried out without the use of digital media for the production or dissemination of knowledge. The term ‘Digital Humanities’ reflects this process and constitutes a scientific field where humanists not only aim to use a certain software, but also to understand research using quantitative semantics. However, digital infrastructures are not the same globally. In her talk at the HSE April International Academic Conference Dr Gimena del Rio Riande addressed various issues that arise in connection with digital humanities.
Slower GDP growth rates over the last several years were brought about by changes on international markets and the exhaustion of transformational bonuses due to the transition from a planned economy to a market economy, and this slowdown proves the necessity of looking for new solutions for stimulating the economy. The authors of the paper ‘Structural Changes in the Russian Economy and Structural Policy’ conducted a large-scale analysis on structural policy in Russia and around the world, as well as on possible ways for this policy to develop further. The first presentation of the paper took place as part of the plenary session called ‘Structural Policy in Russia: New Conditions and a Possible Agenda,’ which closed out HSE’s XIX April International Academic Conference.
The subject of the risks and challenges related to sanctions on Russia is crucial in defining a number of different areas of economic policy. Participants in the round table focused on improving the business environment as one of the ways of responding to sanctions, exchanged opinions during the 19th April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development about how to move into positive economic growth while under this external pressure.