• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Yaroslav Kuzminov: ‘In the next generation, Russia will produce a constellation of widely cited researchers in sociology, economics, and political science’

HSE Rector Yaroslav Kusminov gave a special interview to Dmitry Grishankov, CEO of Expert RA Rating Agency.

— How happy are you with the ongoing reform of higher education in Russia?

 The reform is on the right track overall, but there are problems with resources and with the way some changes are being made.

Russia spends about 0.8% of its GDP on higher education — mainly from the federal budget — and private student fees contribute another 0.4%. According to the OECD, spending on higher education in proportion to country GDPs is 1.4% in the United States, 1.9% in Canada, 2.2% in Finland, and 2.9% in Sweden. Britain and Brazil spent as much as Russia, while Japan spends even less, just 0.7% of its GDP.

But our rates of higher education are one and a half times higher than in Western Europe, with as many as 90% of school leavers applying to colleges and universities; therefore the available funding is spread too thinly and ends up being relatively meagre per capita.

On top of that, the Ministry of Education has budgeted just 1% of public funding, i.e. 4 billion roubles, for research; to compare, supporting one researcher in Western Europe costs 50,000 euro per year.

— What is the solution? Doubling the budget?

 There are three policy options. The first option is to limit the admission to publicly-funded places at universities to those applicants with the highest school graduation test scores in their chosen subjects, while excluding those with lower or average performance from public-funded tuition. This will help increase the funding available for each student by 1.5 times.

Another option could be to charge all publicly-funded students a co-payment the way they now do in China and Germany, where in the past university education used to be free for the student. This will have the added benefit of encouraging students to adopt a more responsible approach both to their studies and to their choice of educational pathway.

Yet a third option is to increase public funding by half a percent of the GDP, i.e. by some 60%; such an increase will be sufficient since due to the demographic decline we will have 1.5 times fewer students in 2020 than today.

In Russia, the duration of general schooling is approximately two years shorter than in many other countries — as a result, there is not enough time for Russian students to learn the basics of several important subjects, such as economics, law, foreign languages, philosophy and sociology in general school. Undergraduate students spend the first two years in college or university completing their general education before they can consciously choose their future career path. But since undergraduate courses in Russia are historically highly specialised, many students come to realise by their third year that they have chosen the wrong department — or the wrong university. This system dates back to the Soviet times and is very hard to change.

Except for its somewhat imperfect implementation, Russia's current educational reform is on the right track. The country needs to support its major research universities focused on training professionals for the global market.

Instead of these highly specialised bachelor's courses linked to strictly defined occupations — such as 'teacher of physics and mathematics' or 'agricultural engineer' — we need courses with a broader focus, i.e. physics and mathematics, social and economic sciences, humanities, earth sciences, etc. Students also need an option — available elsewhere in the world — to switch between undergraduate and master's courses in various combinations. The proportion of students enrolling in a university with a specific occupational goal in mind does not exceed 15-20% of the admission. We should allow them more flexibility in choosing their educational pathways. Students of the world's leading universities spend the first two years studying together and specialise later.

Applied bachelor's degrees, currently available in many countries, provide another good option. By our estimates, about a third of all students who wish to study for an occupation will choose this option rather than go to a vocational school.

— The government has allocated funds to improve the competitiveness of Russian universities — what do you think the result will be?

 It depends on the approach. In 1990 in China they decided to make Beijing and Shanghai universities competitive on a global scale and tripled their budgets over one year. In Russia, the allocated funds are significantly smaller.

We need to qualitatively transform at least 15 major Russian universities that have the potential to become competitive in the global market. A globally competitive university is one having at least 20-30 internationally recognized teams, at least 500 teachers embedded in global networks and earning global-level salaries, and a modern campus.

In order to be perceived as a global leader, a university should have a strong research component and adequate funds for basic research. Only five of Russia's 600 universities — including Moscow State University and St. Petersburg State University — have substantial funding for R&D even though their research budgets are just 10-15% of their educational budgets, most international universities normally spend at least half of their budgets on research.

— But what about the HSE--is it prepared to meet the challenges of global competition?

 The HSE has traditionally invested in its development, in particular in exploratory research and new teachers. In recent years we have been spending in the region 2 billion rubles annually, a quarter of our budget, to this end. As a result, today about 300 of our 2,000 faculty members have had their publications accepted by leading international journals in their fields. We operate 20 international laboratories. We have been developing fast — but still have a long way to go.

Visiting international colleagues often say, "Your dropout rates are crazy! How can you be so cruel?" But I believe that students with poor academic performance should drop out — once you have chosen your field you should stick with it to the end. But too often, people are just lazy.

— But isn't laziness the cause of all progress?

 Not always. Sometimes it is not the cause of progress but plain laziness for its own end. Big cities in Russia have virtually zero unemployment, and people lack incentives to work hard. This is dangerous for the future of this country. Let us at least create incentives for students to be responsible for their own learning and to work hard.

— Do poor performers just drop out — or do they instead just get lower degrees?

It depends, but there will always be dropouts. At the HSE, almost half of all new students drop out during their first year, but then 30% come back and graduate a year or two later, often switching to another HSE faculty, and the remaining 20% transfer to other universities.

— What do you think of courses at Russian universities taught in a a foreign (usually English) language? Many people are proud that their university offers courses in English but is it the right thing to do when students are Russians or come from CIS countries?

In education and research, being global means that we can invite outstanding professors who do not speak Russian, and they should feel comfortable teaching in English here.

 Yes, I believe it is the right thing to do. The economy today is global, culture is global, and research is global. In education and research, being global means that we can invite outstanding professors who do not speak Russian, and they should feel comfortable teaching in English here. A foreign professor should be able to communicate with their students who must therefore speak a foreign language. At the HSE, no courses are taught in English for a Russian-speaking audience just to tick boxes and say we can do it. But if we have three foreign students in the audience who do not understand Russian then everyone should switch to English — it is natural. Similarly, if a teacher suggests a couple of English-language papers for further reading, no one should be complaining but should just get on and read them.

To become a strong, widely cited researcher, one needs to be in the 'communication core' — and we already have such researchers. It is my feeling that in the next generation, perhaps in 20 years or so, Russia will definitely produce a constellation of widely cited researchers in sociology, economics, and political science. Success is inevitable, and do you know why? Because the overall level of culture is high. We are going through an interesting period where economic and social institutions are changing right in front of our eyes. People and organizations here survive and evolve in the face of higher uncertainty than in the West or even in China.

— Another question. Let us imagine that a university — any university — becomes a world-class institution whereas its country has not yet reached a world level for a number of reasons. Under such circumstances, at least in my experience, the university serves as a pump for brain drain by pumping skills out of the country.

 I do not think that by creating a world-class university we contribute to brain drain. Let me explain using a simple example. The HSE was established 20 years ago. Ten years ago, 10% of our students left Russia, mainly for London and New York. Ten years later, we still see 10% of our graduates moving to other countries. But now we have undergraduate and graduate students coming from other countries, and every year we attract about 20-25 world-level teachers and postdocs from Western universities. Today, some 100 foreigners are employed full-time by the HSE, not including the heads of laboratories and other leading researchers who spend a few months every year in Russia — not only at the HSE in Moscow, but also in St. Petersburg and Nizhny Novgorod.

We have the same number of skilled professionals leaving us as we have coming to Russia. Today we admit about 500 foreign students per year — this was not the case ten years ago. I am sure that 70% of these students will stay in Russia.

— Speaking of foreign students, do you mean those from the CIS countries or former Soviet republics?

 Both from the former Soviet republics and from other countries. We have to get used to the fact that the former Soviet Union is now part of a larger world.

Expert Magazine, December 2, 2013

See also:

Unequal Access Codes: What Helps and What Hinders Access to Good Education in Russian Regions

Researchers at the HSE Institute of Education have used regional data to describe, for the first time in Russia, how inequality in access to education affects different parts of the Russian Federation. The research findings reveal that the key determining factors are the local economy and the proportion of people with a university degree: urbanised regions with well-developed economies and educated inhabitants are more likely to have good-quality schools, with a large proportion of students scoring highly in the Unified State Exam and going on to university. In contrast, poorer regions with low human capital see many of their school students drop out after the 9th grade, limiting their chances of further education.

Male Privilege: How Job-Related Training Perpetuates Gender Inequality

Additional certification and training courses can not only affect an employee’s pay grade and career, but their sense of control over their life. Employees who have ‘upgraded’ their professional knowledge and skills find it easier to manage problems both in their personal lives and in the workplace. However, the trend does not hold equally for men and women. A study by Natalia Karmaeva and Andrey Zakharov of the HSE Institute of Education shows that men reap more benefits than women.

Free Will or Fate? Why Russian Children Rarely Switch Schools

Unlike many other countries, Russian children’s educational path is decided from an early age. Starting with the first grade, parents try to send their children to schools where they can remain until they graduate after either the 9th or 11th grades. Moreover, many families do not use the opportunity available to them to transfer their children to a better school partway through their education. The result is that inter-school mobility remains low and a child’s educational path is often hard-wired early on, HSE University sociologists in St. Petersburg found.

Following in the Parents’ Footsteps

Children from families with high professional and educational status are twice as likely to enter a prestigious university as their peers from low-resource families, HSE University researchers have found. The ‘privileged’ adolescents benefit from strong family attitudes towards a good education, parental investment in their studies and the high academic performance associated with it. At the same time, even when they have good grades, students from poorly educated families do not even try to get into prestigious universities.

Per Aspera — But Headed Where?

Russian doctoral school — that only recently switched to the model of structured programmes — is once again at a crossroads. Which is better: the new model or traditional mentoring? And should postgraduate students be considered young scholars or ‘mature’ students? In her report to the Tenth International Russian Higher Education Conference, Natalia Maloshonok shared the views of doctoral research advisors on these and other questions.

International Partners’ Week at HSE: Preparing Students for an Uncertain Future

On June 18, the third International Partners’ Week ‘Academic Agility: Preparing Students for an Uncertain Future’ began at HSE University. The event brings together representatives of more than 30 universities from 16 countries, including France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Turkey, the USA, Finland, the United Kingdom, and China. They have all come to Moscow to learn more about the kind of learning experience HSE University can provide, as well as to discuss practical challenges and solutions regarding international mobility.

General Assembly of International Academy of Education Meets at HSE Moscow

On May 23-24, following the Days of the International Academy of Education held earlier this week, the General Assembly of the International Academy of Education took place at HSE University Moscow.  The assembly brings together education researchers and experts from all over the world, and this is the first time that the biannual meeting was held in Russia. Over the course of two days, members discussed joint projects and publications and met newly inducted members who had the opportunity to introduce themselves and present their research. Members also took part in small group discussions on a variety of topics, including digital literacy and math education.

International Education Experts Gather in Moscow

On May 20, the Days of the International Academy of Education commenced at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow. Experts from all over the world engaged in identifying global education policy trends will hold a series of meetings, master classes, seminars and open lectures. They will share their experience with Russian researchers, instructors and education policy makers over the course of three days.

Odds of Success: How Engagement in Student Clubs Helps Undergraduates Find Good Employment

The more a student engages with various activities on campus, the higher their odds of success post-graduation. According to a study by HSE researchers, not only academic but also research and social engagement, such as participation in student organisations and events, can be linked to the development of critical thinking skills which are essential for general wellbeing as well as career advancement.

Institute of Education: From Extensive Growth to Quality Development

The first meeting of IOE Expert Committee, which includes six international experts in education from five countries alongside three Russian experts, was held on October 19-20. The Committee gave an independent assessment of the Institute's activity and recommendations for finalizing its development strategy until 2024.