• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

‘I Respect Guerilla Actions’

Ksenia Mokrushina, graduate of the HSE Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, MA of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), told us about her experience of study, work and teaching in urban planning.

— Ksenia, let’s start from the beginning. Why did you choose the Higher School of Economics?

— Even in high school, I was already attracted by areas related to economics and international relations. I entered the preparatory courses at the HSE campus in Nizhny Novgorod. In May 2003 the competition for places began, and once I received my results I was enrolled in the Faculty of World Economy (today it is the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs). I decided to go there because, in addition to economics, we had the opportunity to take advanced foreign language courses.

— Today, looking back, how would you evaluate the results of studying at the HSE?

— HSE is a brand that opens many doors. It is undoubtedly a mark of quality for the best employers in Moscow. And if we speak about academic knowledge, I got a general understanding of the global economic system and of how international organizations work. And I also learnt about the field where this knowledge can be applied. In addition to that, an economic education is a good basis for any professional work and postgraduate education. So, I consider my study at the HSE as a platform to the next level.

— How did you build your career, what influenced it?

— After my third year of study I had an internship at Procter&Gamble. After spending 3 months there, I understood that working as a manager in a corporation was not for me. It was much more interesting for me to work at the HSE Institute of Trade Policy, where I studied issues related to the WTO. My excellent academic supervisor, Tatiana Trudaeva, believed in me and helped me to participate in a summer school in Canada in my specialization – trade policy. I wanted to continue working on this topic in an international organization after my graduation.

During the fourth year of study I undertook an internship at the Moscow office of the World Bank, but they didn’t have any WTO-related projects at the time. However, they were actively developing a programme of investment in Russian regions. I took part in this project: looked into the economic and financial situation in the regions, their credit ratings, the state of their budgets and some other problems. While I was finishing my study at the university, I had a very flexible schedule, so I still had time to attend classes and write my master’s thesis.

One of the World Bank projects I took part in was dedicated to studying the energy efficiency potential in Russia. I felt I was involved in a very important topic which could influence the whole Russian economy. The report we wrote was passed on to Vladimir Putin, and then he issued an decree about cutting Russian GDP energy capacity by 40 percent, and work on the federal law on energy efficiency started.

— How and why did you decide to go to study at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)?

— I always wanted to get a Western education and become an international expert. Since I’d spent three years at the World Bank working on energy efficiency, transport and utility issues (generally, city infrastructure problems), I’d naturally begun to be interested in the topic of urban planning. There was no such academic discipline in Russia at that time (Even today, the HSE is only just launching its Graduate School of Urban Studies and Planning). MIT had always been a dream for me, and it turned out that they had the best city planning programme in the USA, and with a very strong component devoted to energy studies, which was just what I wanted.

Since I wasn’t able to pay for the education myself (the fee is $40 000 a year, plus accommodation and living costs), I needed a grant. I applied for a Fulbright grant, and was lucky enough to be awarded one. Once I’d secured the grant, I applied for the master’s programme in city planning. The whole process was very complicated and took almost 18 months. If you’d told me, when I was a high school student that I would one day study at MIT, I wouldn’t have believed you. Six months ago I graduated and came back to Russia to work in urban planning.

— Where do you work today?

— I develop city policy related to sustainable urban development and ecology. The key areas of my interest are city energy and energy efficiency, environmental construction, green city design, development of public transportation and public areas.

Unfortunately, these areas are very poorly developed in Russia, there are only a few, unconnected, projects. Today, together with MIT, we are carrying out an energy study at Skolkovo, which we hope will become the basis for master’s and doctoral courses at Skolkovo University.

— What courses do you teach?

— I teach a course on modern approaches to urban planning at the HSE Graduate School of Urban Studies and Planning. This involves the issues of ‘smart’ and ‘green’ planning. When I was in the USA and found out that the HSE was launching a programme in urban studies, I understood that I couldn’t stand idly by and watch. I called Alexander Vysokovsky, told him about my studies, and for several months now, I’ve been working with the Graduate School of Urban Studies. This is my first experience of teaching, and surprisingly I’m enjoying it. I feel a special drive and professional satisfaction, although I wouldn’t like to teach permanently. After all, I am researcher and practitioner in the first place.

— What do you think about informal activist actions in urban planning, such as the guerilla map of the Moscow metro?

— I respect guerilla actions. Such movements all over the world have played an important role in the development of the urban environment. And they are really important in Russia. This is a special type of planning ‘from below’, an action of civil disobedience, when a citizen’s active conscience wakes up, a vital element for creating demand for change in the city.

See also:

‘Ecology Provides the Best Opportunities for Professional and Personal Development of Young People’

In early May, the HSE Institute of Ecology and the International Children's and Youth Award ‘Ecology is Everyone's Business’ held a joint seminar in Dagestan, where they discussed the launch of youth environmental projects for federal and international competitions. At the meeting, the Institute's experts presented methods of organising project activity in the field of ecology and sustainable development for educators and young people in Dagestan. Teachers and students from more than 50 schools, colleges and universities of the republic took part in the event.

‘Earth Is Our Only Home; We Must Preserve It’

The Green HSE student organisation recently held the ‘Green Conversation’ festival at the Cultural Centre on Pokrovsky Bulvar. At the event, participants discussed the planet’s main ecological problems and the steps required to start building a green future today.

Researchers Explain How Massive Methane Emissions Affect Warming in the Arctic

Expeditions to the Eastern Arctic and Kara Seas investigated the thermal properties of bottom sediments. Numerous zones of bubbling methane flux were discovered in the shelf of the Laptev Sea and the East Siberian Sea, which researchers believe is affecting climate warming in the Arctic. The study has been published inMarine and Petroleum Geology.

Salt Eats Ice: Researchers Name the Reasons Behind Underwater Permafrost Vulnerability

A team of researchers has studied ice-containing sediment on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. The researchers proved that the melting of underwater permafrost is caused not only by the warming of sea water, but also by migrations of its salt ions (mostly NaCl). The HSE News Service reports on this and other studies conducted by the HSE Institute of Ecology.

Scholars Gauged Energy Inequality among Eurasian Economic Union Member States

The UN member states pledged to achieve 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030 that are aimed at saving the planet’s resources and increasing overall well-being. One — Goal 7 — sets out to “ensure universal access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy.”

‘Idea of Environmental Protection Should Become Part of Foreign Policy’

To improve its global competitiveness, Russia needs an independent environmental agenda along with a concept for environmental protection, and it makes sense to suggest a ‘global clean deal’ to Europe. A report outlining this, prepared by a team of experts from HSE University, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and environmentalists, was presented at TASS.

The Caucasus without a Cap

Global warming has caused the total area of more than 600 Greater Caucasus glaciers to drop by approximately 16%, according to an international research team that includes Stanislav Kutuzov, geographer from HSE University. Glaciers without rock debris coverage have decreased more than those with debris coverage.

Climate Control: How Countries Respond to Weather Change

Having studied the impact of warming on countries in Central and Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, Georgy Safonov, Director of the HSE Centre for Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, warns that responding to climate change does not seem to be a top priority for the region's governments, while potential threats are assessed only in economic terms and almost never as a social challenge.

HSE Advocates for Environmental Transparency

More than 40% of Russian citizens consider changing their place of residence due to environmental problems. This was a statistic cited by Lyaila Sinyatullina, Head of the Department of Advanced Studies at HSE University’s Institute for Public Administration and Governance, at a roundtable dedicated to an environmental information bill that will be reviewed by the Russian State Duma.

‘Green’ Taxes: An Analysis of Climate Policy Effectiveness

It is believed that carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere are mainly regulated by ‘direct’ economic instruments - the carbon tax and the Emissions Trading System (ETS). However, a comparative analysis has shown that ‘indirect’ instruments, such as excise taxes on motor fuel and other energy taxes, did not yield any lesser impact than their ‘direct’ counterparts, and, over time, were even more effective.