• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Language Proficiency
English
Contacts
Phone:
+7(495) 772-9590
15389
E-mail:
Timetable
Download CV
SPIN-RSCI: 7660-7036
ORCID: 0000-0002-3067-612X
ResearcherID: K-9138-2015
Scopus AuthorID: 57127809300
Google Scholar
Supervisors
A. Bolotova
M. Falikman
Printable version

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.

Igor Nikitovich Semenov

  • Igor Nikitovich Semenov has been at HSE since 2002.

Education, Degrees and Academic Titles

  • 2010
    Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Science
  • 1998
    Full Member of Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences
  • 1995
    Professor
  • 1993

    Doctor of Sciences* in General Psychology, Psychology of Personality, History of Psychology
    Thesis Title: Psychology of reflection in organizing creative thinking process

  • 1971

    Candidate of Sciences* (PhD) in General Psychology, Psychology of Personality, History of Psychology
    Thesis Title: A systematic study of solving creative tasks

  • 1971

    Doctoral programme
    S.I. Vavilov Institute of History of Natural Science and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sector of the psychology of scientific creativity

  • 1968

    Degree in Psychology
    Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Psychology

* Candidate of Sciences
According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, Candidate of Sciences belongs to ISCED level 8 - "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar. Candidate of Sciences allows its holders to reach the level of the Associate Professor.
* Doctor of Sciences
A post-doctoral degree called Doctor of Sciences is given to reflect second advanced research qualifications or higher doctorates in ISCED 2011.

Courses (2018/2019)

Courses (2017/2018)

Courses (2016/2017)

Courses (2015/2016)

Courses (2013/2014)

Courses (2012/2013)

Courses (2011/2012)

Courses (2010/2011)

Editorial board membership

  • 2012: Editor-in-chief, Психология. Историко-критические обзоры и современные исследования (Psychology. Historical-critical Reviews and Current Researches).

  • 2008: Member of the Editorial Board, Рефлексивные процессы и управление.

  • 2006: Member of the Editorial Board, Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики.

Conferences

  • 2016
    XII Международная научно-практическая конференция «Психология личностного и профессионального развития: современные вызовы и риски» (Москва). Presentation: Нравственное воспитание школьников посредством рефлетехнологий развития личности в допрофессиональном образовании
  • 2014
    Международная научная конференция «Деятельностная теория учения: современное состояние и перспективы» (Москва). Presentation: Типология концептуально-методологических средств развития Н.Ф.Талызиной педагогической психологии
  • 2013
    Идеи О.К. Тихомирова и А.В. Брушлинского и фундаментальные проблемы психологии (к 80-летию со дня рождения) (Москва). Presentation: Методологические средства психологии мышления О.К.Тихомирова и их воздействие на изучение рефлексии
  • Международная научная конференция "Человек, субъект, личность в современной психологии" (к 80-летию А.В. Брушлинского) (Москва). Presentation: Методологические средства субъектной психологии мышления А.В.Брушлинского и их воздействие на изучение рефлексии

Publications1

Article Дударева В. Ю., Semenov I. N. Phenomenology of reflection and its investigation in modern foreign psyclology // Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2008. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 101-120.

RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGY HUNDRED-YEAR DEVELOPMENT, SOCIOCULTURAL REFLECTION: TO THE CENTENARY OF SOVIET PSYCHOLOGY (1918-2018)

Abstract

Relevance. Due to centennial anniversary of soviet psychology, we would

like to make analysis for the history of its institutional and subject formation

within the context of Russian human study evolution, including its prerequisites

before revolution and after-soviet development.

Objective. Characterize briefly, within the context of reflexive science

studies and art process personology, psychology development directions and

institutions, role of key scholars, summarize major achievements, including

unique identity of soviet psychological science.

Methods. Analysis for subject and institutional aspects of Russian

psychology evolution, describing institutions where major schools were residing

and where key leaders and participants fulfilled their duties.

Results. First part contains and depicts science studies and institutional

approach on presenting the historical span of Russian psychology. Second part

depicts evolution of institutions, leaders’ succession and interaction of schools

and directions established. Final part contains generalized conclusions on

development logics and achievements of soviet psychology as preconditions to

further after-soviet establishment of contemporary (Russian) psychology.

Conclusions. Soviet psychology based human studies existing before

revolution legitimately succeeds the preceding evolution phase and provides

evident basis for further development of psychological science during aftersoviet

period. Soviet scholars have developed ample materialist-dialectic

methodology for study of psyche, which is the system of psychological knowledge

Социокультурная рефлексия ... 27

from perspective of activity approach that had quite peculiar impetus on

contemporary psychology. Currently legacy of soviet psychology interacts

broadly and assimilates with foreign up-to-date approaches within the context

of XXI century challenges.

Key words: human study, soviet psychology, history, pedagogics, science

studies, development logics, personology, scientific institutions, personality,

activity, reflection, art process, culture.

А.N. LEONTIEV CONTRIBUTION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY OF THINKING, ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND ERGONOMICS

Abstract
Relevance. Scientific and scientific-organizational activity of a worldfamous
psychologist A.N. Leontiev is a constant interest of specialists in the field
of humanistics, methodologists and historians of psychology. In connection with
the 115th anniversary of this outstanding scientist, it seems relevant to remind
readers of the poorly studied aspects of his life creation.
18 Семенов И.Н.
Objective. Description of contribution А.N. Leontiev in the development
of engineering-psychological, ergonomic and reflexive-acmeological problems
in the 1950-1970’s.
Methods. Science-research analysis (from the positions of reflexive
psychology and personology), and methodological analysis.
Results. The author analyzes such aspects of the scientific heritage of A.N.
Leontiev, as his fundamental research of productive thinking and scientific
creativity, as well as applied developments in the field of engineering psychology
and ergonomics. The fundamental contribution of the scientist to modern human
studies and to the institutional construction of psychological science is shown.
Conclusions. Scientific creativity of A.N. Leontiev in the field of psychology
is interdisciplinary in nature, because it synthesizes the methodological
orientations of modern humanities - natural science, technology cybernetic,
social and humanitarian. The crown of the enormous scientific and organizational
activity of A.N. Leontiev became a large-scale institutionalization of Russian
psychology, which demanded from him not less vision and intuition, intelligence
and will, diplomacy and energy than his outstanding creative activity in the field
of philosophy, psychology, ergonomics and pedagogy.
Key words: A.N. Leontiev, science-research analysis, personology, psychology,
philosophy, methodology, activity, thinking, ergonomics.

THE HISTORY AND LOGIC OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOCIETY OF PSYCHOLOGISTS IN RUSSIA

The article suggests the periodization of the history of the “Psychological society” in Russia,
explicates the logic of its institutional and cognitive development, and also specifically describes
the initial period of its formation at the end of the 19th century, productive activity of such innovative
institutions as “Commission on Logic and Psychology of Thinking” and the section
“Psychology of Creativity” in the second half of the 20th century.
Keywords: psychology, history, philosophy, methodology, science studies, human knowledge,
“Psychological society”, institutional development, cognitive activity, thinking, reflection,
creativity.
DOI: 10.7868/S1819265318020061
Citation: Semenov I. N. (2018). Istoria i logika razvitia v Rossii “Obŝestva psihologov” [The
history and logic of the development of the Society of Psychologists in Russia] // Metodologia
i istoria psihologii. Iss. 2. P. 89–112.

Self_consciousness in the Enactment of Self as a Property of Man and the discovery of «I» Inner Space In the Problem Field of Cognition of the Self Self in the Cognition of Man’s Effectiveness Semenov I. N. Theoretical fundamentals of studying the role of reflection in the processes of selfity in the transdisciplinary context of human sciences . . . . 7

The article analyzes the historical$scientific and philosophy$methodological prepositions for the stu$
dy the reflection in the evolution of human sciences. It is differentiated the key stages and directions of the
reflexive psychology of selfity and creativity, and also for the first time it is generalized its theoretical foun$
dations for transdisciplinary interaction with related sciences and applied use in social practice—manage$
ment and education.
Keywords: psychology, humanism, philosophy, methodology, pedagogy, education, reflection,
consciousness, thinking, activity, creativity, personality, self, selfity, individuality, scientific school.

Theoretical fundamentals of studying the role of reflection

The article analyzes the historical$scientific and philosophy$methodological prepositions for the stu$

dy the reflection in the evolution of human sciences. It is differentiated the key stages and directions of the

reflexive psychology of selfity and creativity, and also for the first time it is generalized its theoretical foun$

dations for transdisciplinary interaction with related sciences and applied use in social practice—manage$

ment and education.

Keywords: psychology, humanism, philosophy, methodology, pedagogy, education, reflection,

consciousness, thinking, activity, creativity, personality, self, selfity, individuality, scientific school.

А.N. LEONTIEV CONTRIBUTION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY OF THINKING, ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND ERGONOMICS

Abstract
Relevance. Scientific and scientific-organizational activity of a worldfamous
psychologist A.N. Leontiev is a constant interest of specialists in the field
of humanistics, methodologists and historians of psychology. In connection with
the 115th anniversary of this outstanding scientist, it seems relevant to remind
readers of the poorly studied aspects of his life creation.
18 Семенов И.Н.
Objective. Description of contribution А.N. Leontiev in the development
of engineering-psychological, ergonomic and reflexive-acmeological problems
in the 1950-1970’s.
Methods. Science-research analysis (from the positions of reflexive
psychology and personology), and methodological analysis.
Results. The author analyzes such aspects of the scientific heritage of A.N.
Leontiev, as his fundamental research of productive thinking and scientific
creativity, as well as applied developments in the field of engineering psychology
and ergonomics. The fundamental contribution of the scientist to modern human
studies and to the institutional construction of psychological science is shown.
Conclusions. Scientific creativity of A.N. Leontiev in the field of psychology
is interdisciplinary in nature, because it synthesizes the methodological
orientations of modern humanities - natural science, technology cybernetic,
social and humanitarian. The crown of the enormous scientific and organizational
activity of A.N. Leontiev became a large-scale institutionalization of Russian
psychology, which demanded from him not less vision and intuition, intelligence
and will, diplomacy and energy than his outstanding creative activity in the field
of philosophy, psychology, ergonomics and pedagogy.


INNOVATICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF REFLEXIVE

 

Semenov Igor Nikitovich (Moscow, Russia), Ph.D in Psychology, Professor, National Research

University “Higher School of Economics”. E-mail: i_samenov@mail.ru

Abstract. The organic insertion of reflexive-humanitarian psychology and realizing its reflexiveactivity

pedagogy in state educational standards meeting the functional requirements of educational

activities carried out in developing innovative Moscow school (gymnasium N 1526) education is shown for

the human capital.

Keywords: reflexive psychology, akmeology, pedagogy, education, development, research, training,

personality, thinking, reflection, consciousness, creativity, human capital.

Timetable for today

Full timetable

HSE Staff Members Receive Acknowledgement Medals

Following a directive of the Rector, key HSE staff members have been awarded ‘Acknowledgement’ medals for their high professional achievements and devotion to work.