Refusal to Enforce Judgements of International Courts With Obligatory Jurisdiction: Comparative Research

Student: Bronnikov Roman

Supervisor: Dmitry Kuznetsov

Educational Programme: Jurisprudence (Bachelor)

Final Grade: 8

Year of Graduation: 2019

The research aims to compare an execution of judgements that are adjudicated by international human rights courts with compulsory jurisdiction within both the Inter-American and European conventional systems. The work contains an examination of backlash between Supreme Court of Argentina and Inter-American Court of Human Rights in order to pick out argumentation of the supreme national court that may be possibly used in a dialogue between the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights. The research suggests that the basis of proper interaction between national and international courts lies down in the recognition of value pluralism.

Full text (added May 13, 2019)

Student Theses at HSE must be completed in accordance with the University Rules and regulations specified by each educational programme.

Summaries of all theses must be published and made freely available on the HSE website.

The full text of a thesis can be published in open access on the HSE website only if the authoring student (copyright holder) agrees, or, if the thesis was written by a team of students, if all the co-authors (copyright holders) agree. After a thesis is published on the HSE website, it obtains the status of an online publication.

Student theses are objects of copyright and their use is subject to limitations in accordance with the Russian Federation’s law on intellectual property.

In the event that a thesis is quoted or otherwise used, reference to the author’s name and the source of quotation is required.

Search all student theses