Evolution of the Procedural Status of the Prosecutor in the Arbitration Process in Russia

"Evolution of the Procedural Status of the Prosecutor in the Arbitration Process in Russia" The master's thesis is devoted to the study of the evolution of the procedural status of the prosecutor in the arbitration process in Russia. Its purpose is to study the features of the procedural status of the prosecutor in the arbitration process in Russia in different historical periods. This work is divided into three chapters. The first chapter examines the theoretical foundations of the participation of the prosecutor in the arbitration process, namely, issues related to the history of the formation of the institution, comparison of the status of the prosecutor in the arbitration process in Russia (according to the APC 1992, 1995, 2002). The second and third chapters analyze the procedural position of the prosecutor, the forms of his participation in the arbitration process. The study is devoted to the study of the problems of legislative regulation, proposals for amending the institution under consideration are considered. The normative basis for the study of the work was the Constitution of the Russian Federation, normative legal acts, both in force at the present time, and acts that had legal force earlier, depending on the historical period under consideration. The graduation work includes an analysis of statistical data on the participation of prosecutors in the arbitration process, presented on the official websites of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Despite the constant improvement of the rules of arbitration procedural legislation governing the institution of the participation of the prosecutor in the process, there are shortcomings and gaps. A number of topical problems of the participation of the prosecutor in the consideration of cases by arbitration courts require a solution at the legislative level, as well as through the adoption of appropriate explanations by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, taking into account the extremely contradictory judicial practice and previously given explanations.