Бакалавриат
2025/2026
Сравнительная политика
Статус:
Курс обязательный (Политология)
Где читается:
Санкт-Петербургская школа социальных наук
Когда читается:
2-й курс, 1, 2 модуль
Охват аудитории:
для всех кампусов НИУ ВШЭ
Преподаватели:
Арбатли Эким,
Иванов Евгений Александрович,
Семушкина Екатерина Сергеевна,
Шевцова Ирина Константиновна,
Юзбекова Карина Шамильевна
Язык:
английский
Кредиты:
5
Контактные часы:
58
Course Syllabus
Abstract
The course offers an introduction to the core concepts in comparative politics and their empirical applications. The course consists of two principal parts: the first 7 topics focus on democracies, while the subsequent 6 weeks are dedicated to autocratic and hybrid regimes; the course is concluded with a debate session in seminar groups. In the first half of the course, those varieties within democratic regimes – such as the difference between parliamentary and presidential systems, consensual and majoritarian democracies, etc. – are discussed which served as the inspiration for classical works and theories in comparative politics. The second half of the course continues this discussion by addressing key questions around authoritarian regimes, such as – among others – the problems of authoritarian rule, selectorate theory, or methods of authoritarian control.In conclusion, the course familiarizes students with the foundations of regime-level and institutional comparisons, and enhances their understanding on the relationship between fundamental concepts and their various empirical manifestations.
Learning Objectives
- The course comprises of 13 lectures (26 academic hours) and 16 seminars / discussion groups (32 academic hours). The following teaching methods are involved: Lectures: - Multimedia support: all lectures are followed by multimedia presentation (slides) with textual and visual materials; - Interactive lectures: interactive elements (quizzes, surveys) during the lecture are used. Seminars (tutorials): - Debates and open discussions based on the mandatory readings; - Mini-group work (collective tasks in class); - Case analysis individually or collectively.
Expected Learning Outcomes
- ● Works in team effectively
- ● Establishes causal inferences, assesses and evaluates social, political, and economic events and processes in a cross-national context; identifies trends and patterns of integrated development at the global, macro-regional, national, and subnational levels.
- ● Applies the theoretical, methodological, and conceptual toolkit of political science and international relations to solving problems of governmental and managerial nature, for the following purposes: governmental bodies; private organizations; non-governmental and international organizations; political-business nexus; media.
- ● Conducts applied analysis of political, foreign policy, organizational and managerial processes, as well as political courses to determine the features of their functioning and formulate proposals for their transformation.
- ● Identifies the features and trends of socio-political development of regions and countries of the world, and integrating this analysis in addressing professional tasks.
Course Contents
- Logic of comparison: why the comparative politics is comparative?
- Overview on political systems: what makes a regime ‘democratic’?
- Presidential, parliamentary and semi-presidential systems
- Electoral systems and elections in democracies
- Party systems and coalitions
- Decentralization and federalism
- Democratic backsliding
- Authoritarian regimes and the problems of authoritarian rule
- Authoritarian power-sharing and the selectorate theory
- Change and continuity in authoritarian regimes: Coups and coup-proofing
- Authoritarian control
- Resource curse and rentier states
- Political violence: civil war, ethnic conflict, terrorism
- Summary: debate session
- Position paper
- Film analysis
- Final exam
Assessment Elements
- class participationRecommendations for class participation ● Meaningful engagement with the mandatory readings demonstrated ● Own critical approach to the reading and lecture materials elucidated ● By bringing in concepts and empirical examples from other fields of study, the student demonstrates a complex understanding of the introduced concepts ● Contribution to the class dynamics: by reflecting on earlier points and comments, students can again demonstrate a practical understanding of the discussed concepts, as well as their abilities to understand the dynamics of ongoing discussions. Conversely, redundant and self-serving comments will lower the participation grade. ● In case someone finds participation in discussions challenging, there is also an opportunity to send questions and comments related to the mandatory readings before the respective class sessions.
- film analysisRecommendations for the film analysis For this assignment, the students will be asked to pick a topic from the syllabus. Each topic has questions about political processes and accompanying movies assigned. The students should watch the movies with these questions in mind. Then, they should write a critical film analysis, answering the given questions based on the film. The analysis shall not exceed 1,000 words, including foot/endnotes, excluding the bibliography. The grade will be based on the clarity and relevance of the answers to the given questions, and the depth of understanding of the subject matter. Originality of the analysis will also distinguish excellent answers from good answers. Clarity and relevance means how well the student can connect the ideas in these movies with the works that were studied during the lectures and seminars. Originality means whether the student can offer a fresh perspective to connect these ideas. The following points are important: - The analysis should answer all of the questions listed for a topic on the assignment. - In the answer, students should use the comparative politics concepts learned in this course (e.g. representation, veto player, authoritarian control, etc.) to answer the questions with specific examples/anecdotes/analysis from the movies. The students are NOT expected to criticize the movie artistically, but rather to consider its political and theoretical implications. - The analysis should cite scholarly sources whenever possible. There should be at least five scholarly sources (books, articles, etc.) cited to back up the arguments.
- position paperRecommendations for the position paper The position paper shall be a problem-based, argumentative text demonstrating the student’s capacity to identify academically relevant problems, finding avenues to tackle it, and communicating her/his arguments in a persuasive, transparent, and succinct manner. The position paper should also demonstrate the student’s firm understanding on the differences between epistemic and methodological traditions. The position paper’s extent shall not exceed 1,5 - 2 pages (A4) of the handwritten text. The review part of the essay shall not exceed 40% of the position paper. The position paper is written in the classroom in the second part of the course in the framework of one of the seminars . Essay structure: 1. Short and general formulation of answer, outline of structure 2. Review of relevant claims in the literature 3. Critical review of relevant positions. 4. Core of argument, supported by analytical and/or empirical claims. 5. Conclusion, summarizing the core points of the argument.
- final examRecommendations for the exam The exam has the closed-book format only and reflects both on the factual knowledge of students and their analytical skills. In the first part of the exam (30 minutes) students will be given multiple choice questions, or tasks requiring very short answers, focusing on key concepts and the mandatory readings. In the second part (90 minutes) students will answer two essay questions: one pertaining to topics 1-7, while the other to topics 8-15. In both cases, students will be given at least two different questions, and will have to answer each in max. one handwritten page.
Interim Assessment
- 2025/2026 2nd module0.15 * class participation + 0.2 * film analysis + 0.4 * final exam + 0.25 * position paper
Bibliography
Recommended Core Bibliography
- Clark, W. R. (DE-588)13711754X, (DE-576)302153160. (2013). Principles of comparative politics / William Roberts Clark; Matt Golder; Sona Nadenichek Golder. Los Angeles [u.a.]: CQ Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.359208835
- Comparative politics / ed. by Daniele Caramani. (2011). Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.330675516
Recommended Additional Bibliography
- Erica Frantz. (2018). Authoritarianism : What Everyone Needs to Know®. Oxford University Press.
- Newton, K., & Deth, J. W. van. (2005). Foundations of Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=165069