• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Версия для слабовидящихВерсия для слабовидящихЛичный кабинет сотрудника ВШЭПоиск
Расширенный поиск
Меню
Высшая школа экономики
Личный кабинет сотрудника ВШЭПоиск
Расширенный поиск

Course Syllabus

Аспирантура 2021/2022

Методологические проблемы исследования мировой политики

Статус: Курс по выбору
Направление: 41.06.01. Политические науки и регионоведение
Кто читает: Департамент политики и управления
Когда читается: 2-й курс, 1 семестр
Формат изучения: без онлайн-курса
Охват аудитории: для своего кампуса
Преподаватели: Фергюсон Йен Эндрю
Язык: английский
Кредиты: 4
Контактные часы: 36

Course Syllabus

Full Syllabus

Abstract

This is an intensive course on the methodologies that can be used to address research problems in world politics. It is designed specifically for advanced, postgraduate students. As such, it assumes a basic-to-intermediate knowledge of qualitative research design and the theories of international relations. It is a course about methodologies rather than methods. Methods are techniques for gathering and analysing bits of data, whereas methodology is “a concern with the logical structure and procedure of scientific enquiry” (Sartori 1970, 1,033). All research projects are to some extent multi-method. The question we must ask ourselves in our research projects is not about whether to mix methods, but how to do so in a manner that is coherent, or hangs together. The problems come when we try to mix methodologies. This is a much more fraught exercise, inasmuch as a methodology implies an epistemology and perhaps also an ontology – in short, a philosophy of science – in the way that a method does not. With that in mind, the course is divided into two parts. The first part The Problem of Explanation deals with two research traditions in the philosophy of social science, the extent to which these are in tension, and why this matters for doing research on world politics. We will cover the philosophical debates about rationality, causality, agency and structure that continue to shape the research agenda in the study of world politics, and the social sciences more broadly. The second part of the course, The Problem of Discourse Analysis, explores the main methodological approaches to analysing expressions of language (spoken and written) in world politics. This is a deliberately broad and inclusive conception of what discourse is. We shall cover hermeneutical (or interpretive) and critical approaches to discourse analysis and how they have been applied in celebrated works by leading researchers of world politics. The course closes with reflections on the problem of doing discourse analysis (and indeed any form of research in the social sciences) in ways that combine two different philosophies of science, one that is positivist/realist and the other that is hermeneutical/critical.
Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

  • To introduce students to the philosophical analysis of explanation in world politics
  • To introduce students to the philosophical analysis of relevant key concepts for their PhD research projects including facts, values, cause, reason, rationality, agency, structure, interpretation, action, rhetoric and discourse
  • To introduce the history of philosophical debates that underpin current controversies regarding social scientific explanation in world politics, particularly with regards to the analysis of discourse
  • To introduce the philosophical analysis of methodologies including positivism, scientific realism, poststructuralism and hermeneutics
  • To evaluate the application of these methodologies to the analysis of discourses of world politics
Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected Learning Outcomes

  • Evaluate their own position on these key debates, in particular where they stand (with regards to their PhD research projects) on the positivist/realist versus hermeneutical/critical divide
  • Grasp the meaning of key concepts of this philosophical analysis and be able to explain them in academic writing
  • Relate the history of key philosophical debates and controversies regarding the social scientific explanation of world politics
  • Revise and update the research proposal / methodology chapter of their PhD dissertation with reference to some of the leading work in the philosophy of social science and/or discourse analysis
  • Understand the basics of the philosophical analysis of explanation in world politics
Course Contents

Course Contents

  • Theme 1: The Problem of Explanation (1 Lecture & 7 Seminars)
  • Theme 2: The Problem of Discourse Analysis (3 Lectures & 7 Seminars)
Assessment Elements

Assessment Elements

  • non-blocking Seminars
  • non-blocking Mid-term test
  • non-blocking Written assignment
Interim Assessment

Interim Assessment

  • 2021/2022 1st semester
    0.4 * Written assignment + 0.3 * Mid-term test + 0.3 * Seminars
Bibliography

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

  • Campbell, D. (1998). Writing Security : United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Vol. Rev. ed). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=185233
  • Dunn, K. C., & Neumann, I. B. (2016). Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1527157
  • Finlayson, A. (2007). From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 9(4), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00269.x
  • Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2008). Structure, Agency and Power in Political Analysis: Beyond Contextualised Self-Interpretations. Political Studies Review, 6(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2008.00149.x
  • Hall, I. (2012). Dilemmas of Decline. United States, North America: eScholarship, University of California. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.742B1732
  • Hansen, L. (2006). Security As Practice : Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=116634
  • Howarth, D. R. (2013). Poststructuralism and After : Structure, Subjectivity and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=659241
  • Jackson, P. T. (2010). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations : Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Hoboken: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1214790
  • McIntyre, L. C., & Rosenberg, A. (2017). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science (Vol. 1 [edition]). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1435679
  • Rhodes, R. A. W., & Bevir, M. (2015). Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1021249
  • Toulmin, S. E. (2001). Return to Reason. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=282149
  • Wendt, A. E. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization, (03), 335. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.a.cup.intorg.v41y1987i03p335.370.02

Recommended Additional Bibliography

  • Archer, M., Lawson, T., Norrie, A., Bhaskar, R., & Collier, A. (2013). Critical Realism : Essential Readings. Hoboken: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=602668
  • Bevir, M. (2000). The Logic of the History of Ideas. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.922A6A01
  • Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. (2015). Interpretation and its Others. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.95B48A6A
  • FINLAYSON, A. (2014). Proving, Pleasing and Persuading? Rhetoric in Contemporary British Politics. Political Quarterly, 85(4), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12122
  • Hall, C. (Ian), Bevir, M., & Daddow, O. (2015). Interpreting Global Security. Australia, Australia/Oceania: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.9FE84B95
  • Hays, S. (1994). Structure and Agency and the Sticky Problem of Culture. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.2307/202035
  • Hollis, M. (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science : An Introduction. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=366240
  • Holzscheiter, A. (2014). Between Communicative Interaction and Structures of Signification: Discourse Theory and Analysis in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives, 15(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12005
  • JON ELSTER. (2009). Explaining Social Behavior. More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.4D41703F
  • Joseph, J., Palgrave Connect (Online service), & Wight, C. (2010). Scientific Realism and International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=356544
  • Mark Bevir, & Jason Blakely. (2018). Interpretive Social Science : An Anti-Naturalist Approach. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=2245835
  • Moses, J. W., & Knutsen, T. L. (2012). Ways of Knowing : Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research (Vol. 2nd ed). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1525147
  • Neumann, I. B. (1999). Uses of the Other : “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=185228
  • Ruben, D.-H. (1992). Explaining Explanation. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=94818
  • Shklar, J. N. (2004). Squaring the Hermeneutic Circle. Social Research, 71(3), 655–678. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=14829593
  • Wight, C. (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations : Politics As Ontology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=174462
  • Winch, P. (2008). The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=495203