• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
2026/2027

Качественные и количественные методы исследований в психологии

Статус: Маго-лего
Когда читается: 2 модуль
Охват аудитории: для своего кампуса
Язык: английский
Кредиты: 3
Контактные часы: 28

Course Syllabus

Abstract

This course develops students' ability to think critically about research and make informed methodological decisions throughout the research process. Rather than presenting research methods as a collection of techniques, the course examines how research questions emerge, how knowledge is built through engagement with the literature, and how different qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches address different types of research problems. Students learn to justify methodological choices, critically evaluate published research, and understand the philosophical assumptions underlying different research paradigms. The course concludes with contemporary issues in research integrity, including open science, reproducibility, publication bias, preregistration, and the ethical use of artificial intelligence in research.
Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

  • To develop students' understanding of research as a process of making informed methodological decisions grounded in theory, evidence, and the nature of the research problem.
  • To equip students with conceptual frameworks for critically evaluating research literature and selecting appropriate qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods approaches to answer different types of research questions.
  • To foster critical and responsible research thinking by introducing students to contemporary principles of research integrity, open science, and ethical research practice.
Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected Learning Outcomes

  • Formulate and justify research questions by integrating theoretical perspectives, practical needs, and existing evidence.
  • Evaluate the quality, credibility, and limitations of published research using contemporary standards of research integrity and open science.
  • Justify methodological decisions throughout the research process, from framing the problem to selecting an appropriate research design.
  • Critically compare qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches and explain the types of questions each approach is best suited to answer.
  • Provide arguments about the quality, credibility, and limitations of published research using contemporary standards of research integrity and open science.
Course Contents

Course Contents

  • What Is Worth Investigating?
  • What Is Already Known About the Research Problem?
  • How Can Qualitative Data Help Answer the Research Question?
  • How Can Quantitative Data Help Answer the Research Question?
  • When Can We Make Causal Claims?
  • What If One Method Is Not Enough?
  • Why Should We Not Automatically Trust Even Good Research?
Assessment Elements

Assessment Elements

  • non-blocking Assignment 1. Understanding Literature Review Methodologies
  • non-blocking Assignment 2. Experiencing Qualitative Data Analysis
  • non-blocking Building a Research Decision Portfolio
Interim Assessment

Interim Assessment

  • 2026/2027 2nd module
    0.2 * Assignment 2. Experiencing Qualitative Data Analysis + 0.6 * Building a Research Decision Portfolio + 0.2 * Assignment 1. Understanding Literature Review Methodologies
Bibliography

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

  • Creswell, J. W. . (DE-588)133331512, (DE-576)164944168. (1994). Research design : qualitative and quantitative approaches / John W. Creswell. Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.040749258
  • Creswell, J. W. . V. (DE-588)133331512, (DE-627)543371581, (DE-576)164944168, aut. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research John W. Creswell (Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan), Vicki L. Plano Clark (School of Education, University of Cincinnati).

Recommended Additional Bibliography

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications Inc. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=63251
  • Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.5F652A76

Authors

  • ANTIPKINA INNA VENIAMINOVNA