• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
2026/2027

Психометрические теории и анализ тестовых заданий

Статус: Маго-лего
Когда читается: 3, 4 модуль
Охват аудитории: для всех кампусов НИУ ВШЭ
Язык: английский
Кредиты: 6
Контактные часы: 60

Course Syllabus

Abstract

Prerequisite: basic knowledge in statistics. This course introduces the fundamental concepts of modern measurement theory, including the Rasch measurement approach and item response theory (IRT). It begins with a brief review of classical test theory, its relationship to IRT, and the basic assumptions underlying the latter. The course then transitions smoothly to Rasch measurement, covering its basic principles and assumptions. Through Rasch models for dichotomous and polytomous data, students will learn how Rasch analysis transforms scored observations into linear measures. Both theoretical and practical aspects of data analysis, output interpretation, and reporting are addressed throughout. Beyond the Rasch approach, the course covers core methods for parameter estimation, fit and dimensionality assessment, and differential item functioning (DIF), along with an introduction to linking and equating. It further examines a range of dichotomous and polytomous IRT models — including 1PL, 2PL, 3PL, GRM, and GPCM — as well as extensions to multidimensional and multi-facet modeling. Designed to be accessible to students without an advanced background in psychometrics or statistics, the course also offers depth for those seeking a more thorough understanding of measurement theory. Using R software and AI tools, students will learn to apply core psychometric analysis methods to real-world examples in education, psychology, and human resources.
Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

  • The objectives of mastering the discipline "Psychometric Theories and Analysis of Test Items" is to master the basic theoretical principles and practical skills of analyzing test items, building and analyzing tools and scales within the framework of IRT and modern measurement approaches.
Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected Learning Outcomes

  • Assess the quality of measurement tools in psychology and education based on reliability and validity of measurements;
  • Possess practical skills in using standard IRT methods and models for building and analyzing specific assessment tools in education, building and analyzing scales and methods in psychology, sociology and other social sciences;
  • Navigate the flow of scientific information to search for the necessary mathematical models and methods of analysis to solve psychometric problems.
  • Be able to choose and apply IRT models that correspond to the goals of the analysis (dichotomous and polytomic, one-dimensional and multidimensional, multifaceted, etc).
  • Analyze test items and tests in the framework of IRT using appropriate software products, interpret and present the results of the analysis
Course Contents

Course Contents

  • Why is psychometrics needed?
  • Classical Test Theory (CTT)
  • Principles for measuring latent variables within the framework of IRT.
  • Basic dichotomous models.
  • Polytomous Rasch models
  • Rating Scale Analysis
  • Linking
  • Psychometrics and AI
  • Dichotomous and Polytomous models of IRT
  • Analysis of measurement properties of items in IRT
  • DIF analysis
  • Explanatory Item Response Theory Models. LLTM.
  • Multifaceted models
  • Multidimensional IRT models
Assessment Elements

Assessment Elements

  • non-blocking Group analysis work
  • non-blocking Colloquium
  • non-blocking Control test 0.5
  • non-blocking Individual reading assignments
  • non-blocking Exam. Practice
    Practical croup work. Case analysis. Policy on the Use of AI Tools In accordance with the regulations of HSE University, students are required to disclose any use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in their assignments using the following recommendations: https://www.hse.ru/en/studyspravka/ai_guidelines/. It is strictly prohibited to submit work that is entirely generated by AI. Any assignment, or specific answer within an assignment, that is found to be fully AI-generated will not be considered the student's own work. Consequently, such submissions will receive a score of zero and will not be evaluated by the instructor.
  • non-blocking Exam. Theory
    Test is part of the exam.
Interim Assessment

Interim Assessment

  • 2026/2027 4th module
    0.15 * Control test 0.5 + 0.1 * Individual reading assignments + 0.2 * Exam. Practice + 0.15 * Colloquium + 0.2 * Group analysis work + 0.2 * Exam. Theory
Bibliography

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

  • An introduction to network psychometrics: Relating ising network models to item response theory models. (2018). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1379379
  • Andrich, D., & Hagquist, C. (2014). Real and Artificial Differential Item Functioning in Polytomous Items. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.E4A6BD97
  • Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems, Lord, F. M., 2008
  • Applying the rasch model : fundamental measurement in the human sciences, Bond, T. G., 2007
  • Baker, F. B., & Kim, S.-H. (2017). The Basics of Item Response Theory Using R. Springer.
  • Bing Jia, Xue Zhang, & Zhemin Zhu. (2019). A Short Note on Aberrant Responses Bias in Item Response Theory. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00043
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model : Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Third Edition (Vol. Third edition). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1002030
  • Explanatory item response models: a generalized linear and nonlinear approach. (2005). Journal of Educational Measurement, 42(3), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2005.00016.x
  • Fundamentals of item response theory, Hambleton, R. K., 1991
  • Introduction to classical and modern test theory, Crocker, L., 2008
  • Isabel Maia, Milton Severo, & Ana Cristina Santos. (2020). Application of the mixture item response theory model to the Self-Administered Food Security Survey Module for Children. PLoS ONE, 15(1), e0228099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228099
  • Item response theory for psychologists, Embretson, S. E., 2009
  • James, A., Algina, J., & Swaminathan, H. (2015). Psychometrics: Classical Test Theory. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.7E3F0482
  • Ludlow, L. H., Matz-Costa, C., Johnson, C., Brown, M., Besen, E., & James, J. B. (2014). Measuring Engagement in Later Life Activities: Rasch-Based Scenario Scales for Work, Caregiving, Informal Helping, and Volunteering. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 47(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175614522273
  • Measuring the mind : conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics, Borsboom, D., 2009
  • Mescheder, L., Nowozin, S., & Geiger, A. (2017). Adversarial Variational Bayes: Unifying Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsarx&AN=edsarx.1701.04722
  • Morera, O. F., & Stokes, S. M. (2016). Coefficient α as a Measure of Test Score Reliability: Review of 3 Popular Misconceptions. American Journal of Public Health, 106(3), 458. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302993
  • Network psychometrics with R : a guide for behavioral and social scientists, , 2022
  • Purwo Susongko, Mobinta Kusuma, & Heru Widiatmo. (2019). Using Rasch Model to Detect Differential Person Functioning and Cheating Behavior in Natural Sciences Learning Achievement Test. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i2.5945
  • Rasch models for measurement, Andrich, D., 1988
  • Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology, Furr, R. M., 2011
  • The intrinsic and extrinsic motivation subscales of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire:A Rasch-based construct validity study. (2018). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.322BDC71
  • Tutz, G. (2020). A Taxonomy of Polytomous Item Response Models.
  • Vandemeulebroecke, M., Bornkamp, B., Krahnke, T., Mielke, J., Monsch, A., & Quarg, P. (2017). A Longitudinal Item Response Theory Model to Characterize Cognition Over Time in Elderly Subjects. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 6(9), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12219
  • Wanichtanom, R. (2001). Methods of Detecting Differential Item Functioning: A Comparison of Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psychology Theses & Dissertations.

Recommended Additional Bibliography

  • Ronald K. Hambleton, & Russell W. Jones. (n.d.). ========================= = ITEMS. Instructional Topics in Educational Measurement ========================= An NCME Instructional Module on Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory and Their Applications to Test Development. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.46F2C9F0

Authors

  • IVANOVA ALINA EVGENEVNA
  • KARDANOVA ELENA Iurevna