‘I Have Really Happy Memories of Studying at ICEF’
Mikhail Savkin an ICEF alumnus is Global Strategy & Development Director at Schneider Electric in France. He talked to the HSE website about his education and his career.
— Mikhail why did you choose ICEF when you first applied to university?
— The big attraction for me at ICEF was the Double Diploma and studying in English. I had already lived abroad for a while at that point and wanted to keep my language going at a high level. I passed the exam and was offered a grant to study at the Faculty of Economics. ICEF also offered me a place. My parents agreed it was worth paying the fees for the Double Diploma in English.
— What are your lasting memories of ICEF from those days?
— I have really happy memories of studying at ICEF. The teachers were good and the students were great. I was always a bit nerdy and I enjoyed every year of studying. I think it’s a sign of the high quality of teaching at ICEF that my feelings about it are still very positive. Even though I studied in world class universities later. Besides, it’s thanks to ICEF that I got a full grant to study at the London School of Economics, with all my fees and maintenance paid.
— Where did you study after that?
— I graduated from ICEF and went straight on to the Master’s at LSE. I don’t have such happy memories of that, by the way. Then, after working for a while I started an MBA at INSEAD in France which, to this day, I consider synonymous with the highest standards in education. But it wouldn’t be right to compare INSEAD with ICEF because an MBA is for adults and although the teachers at INSEAD are top notch, I was much more interested in the other students in my study team. They were all professionals already, so being with them played a huge part in my education. It just doesn’t work like that on the bachelor’s programme. But if someone asked me what I would change at ICEF to make it even better, I would suggest introducing teamwork and practical learning. It’s how they will be working in the future and the sooner they start, the better they will learn.
— What made your impressions of LSE less positive than those of ICEF?
— There are objective and subjective reasons.
Firstly, I chose the wrong course. It was designed for people with a strong economics background. So there was a lot that I didn’t know.
Secondly, LSE doesn’t have a campus. After classes the students all go about their business. I didn’t make friends with anyone. That was a big minus.
— What happened in terms of your career after the Master’s?
— After LSE, I got a job in consulting with McKinsey. I returned to Russia and worked in their Moscow office for three years. They paid for my MBA and I went to study at INSEAD. The university is just outside Paris but the students are from all over the world. When I finished my MBA I stayed on to work in the Paris office and then decided to go into industry at Schneider Electric. My career as a consultant is a classic case. I came into a job in strategy which is a typical way to get into industry. They won’t put you in operations initially, but give you a couple of years to learn how the business works, get to know the heads of departments and decide which area you want to pursue. I got to know the team at Schneider when I was a consultant for them.
— Why did you decide to quit consulting?
— For two reasons. First of all I began to think, well, here I am, wisely giving out all this advice but I don’t have any responsibilities. If you believe in something, you want to see how your decisions come to life and take responsibility for them. I was consulting in the car industry and I decided to go back to energy efficiency which I find really interesting.
— What advice would you give to someone graduating from ICEF now? Apply for a Master’s in Russia or abroad?
— I would always recommend studying abroad. It’s a very useful experience. It changes your view of the world. It’s enriching. I’m not saying you should stay abroad to work afterwards but study, yes, it’s worthwhile. If you have a Master’s from Europe or the US you can find a job in Russia just as easily as with a Russian Master’s. That’s not the case in France, they don’t recognise foreign qualifications, but we do.
— Where is the most interesting place to work?
— Everywhere is interesting to work. Working in different countries is also a good experience. Business is conducted in such different ways in different cultures. Russian and international companies have different approaches to consultancy. In Russia consultants substitute middle managers and work with them in partnership. In Europe they bring in a consultant to deal with a particular issue and when it is sorted out, that’s it, thanks and goodbye! In Russia there are more possibilities for improvement and this gives more room for manoeuvre. But all the same, whatever you want to achieve, it all happens much more slowly than in Europe.
— What personal qualities are important for someone who wants to be a consultant?
— The most important thing is to be curious and to want to learn more
— What would you wish the many ICEF graduates who go straight into consulting after university?
— I would remind them of the work- life balance. There is a lot of work and it’s interesting but you need to have a life too. No one will say to you, ‘OK, you’ve earnt something, now it’s time to go home’. You have to deal with it yourself. Consulting gives you a good chance to find out about different companies, different industries, different businesses. But after a while you need to decide which area you want to work in, what you want to achieve and is it worth staying in consulting. I would advise asking yourself that question at the earliest opportunity.
Ekaterina Rylko, especially for ICEF, HSE.
Researchers at the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences have studied the relationship between the changes in the bitcoin prices and the media attention to this cryptocurrency. The researchers examined the mentions of bitcoin in the media between 2017 and 2021 and built a mathematical model that revealed the strong relationship between media attention and bitcoin prices. The study was published in the Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry journal.
Researchers at HSE University and George Mason University have investigated the sustainability of prospective international agreements on solar geoengineering. The authors have proposed a scheme in which payments flow from affluent nations to less wealthy ones; an arrangement which sets their proposal apart from traditional systems. The proposed model aims to dissuade more vulnerable countries from excessive use of the prevalent geoengineering method by providing compensation for the potential damage they may incur and supporting their adaptation to climate change. The paper has been published in Environmental and Resource Economics.
Victoria Dobrynskaya, Assistant Professor at the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences, has analysed the price dynamics of 2,000 cryptocurrencies from 2014 to 2021 and investigated the association between downside risks and average returns in the cryptocurrency market. As it turns out, cryptocurrencies exhibiting a greater risk tend to yield higher average returns. The study has been published in International Review of Financial Analysis.
Claudia Goldin's award was predicted by five people. They are Olga Peresypkina (RSVPU), Anastasia Sirotina (first-year student of the Bachelor's in Applied Mathematics and Information Science at HSE University), Mikhail Shabanov (Global Vision Asset Management LLC), Tatul Hayrapetyan (PhD student at the Stanford Graduate School of Business), and Hemant Kumar (Ettumanoorappan College, Kerala, India).
According to HSE and MGIMO economists, increased financial sector risks in developed countries may be associated with a higher carbon footprint in banks' loan portfolios. This is likely due to the fact that in response to an unstable economic situation, banks tend to issue more loans to companies that have a detrimental impact on the environment. Although this might yield short-term profits for the banks, such trends hinder humanity's progress towards achieving a green economy. The paper has been published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has awarded the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2023 to Claudia Goldin (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA), ‘for having advanced our understanding of women’s labour market outcomes.’ According to the Nobel committee, Professor Goldin has uncovered key factors that determine gender differences in the labour market.
Millennials Are Three Times Ahead of Zoomers in the Monetised Creator Economy. Even Boomers Outperform Them. Okay Then…
A group of specialists from the HSE Institute for Cultural Studies, Vitaly Kurennoy, Alexander Suvalko and Maria Figura, have determined two main trends that are actively shaping the image of the creative economy and culture in 2021-2023: the creator economy and the maker economy.
HSE researchers have analysed teaching load data at the HSE campus in St Petersburg to investigate the potential impact of teaching on faculty research output. They found that factors such as teaching primarily masters' courses, conducting 20% of lectures in English, and supervising only one doctoral student per year were associated with a greater likelihood of producing more high-quality academic papers. The study has been published in Higher Education Quarterly.
Nargiz Mammadova, from Azerbaijan, is a 2022 graduate of the Economics: Research Programme and a finalist of the Global Essay Competition in St. Gallen. As she prepares to start her Master of Public Administration in International Development programme at Harvard in August 2023, Nargiz reflects on her time studying at HSE University during the COVID-19 pandemic, talks about her work for the State Oil Fund of Azerbaijan, and shares an important message for future students.
Researchers at the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences Laboratory for Wealth Measurement analysed income and cost of living data at the sub-regional level in Russia (municipalities) and in the US (counties). The study reveals that territorial differences in the cost of living are more pronounced in Russia compared to the United States. However, the distribution of overall income across settlements of varying sizes is quite comparable in both countries. The article has been published in the HSE Economic Journal.