Drawn by Moscow’s Cultural Appeal, U.S. Student Chooses HSE to Embark on Research Career
On January 29, Thomas Espy, a student in the Population and Development Master’s programme at HSE, presented a report entitled ‘Mapping Xenophobia in Russia’. During his presentation, he highlighted his paper’s linear analysis of xenophobic attacks in the Russian Federation and a network analysis focusing on nationalist groups, as well as recommended areas of focus for Russian policymakers.
Although his first attempt to learn Russian as a teenager failed, Thomas, originally from Alabama, has long been drawn by Russian language and culture. He eventually learned the language and acquired experience living and studying in Russia. While completing his undergraduate studies at the University of Pittsburgh, he decided to embark on a research career in Moscow, a decision which led him to enrol in the Master’s programme in Population and Development at HSE.
He agreed to speak with the HSE news service about his recent presentation, his research interests and how he finds life in Russia.
— How did you choose the topic of your presentation, ‘Mapping Xenophobia in Russia’?
— I began studying xenophobia in Russia around September 2012 when I started on my Bachelor's thesis. By the end of the project, I felt I had discovered a new academic passion. I returned to this topic in spring 2014, when I attempted to do a series of quantitative analyses on some data from the SOVA Center for Information and Analyses, the Moscow-based NGO that hosted me during my summer 2014 internship.
I was dissatisfied with the quality of my research, so I decided to delve deeper by gathering the data more directly. I travelled to Moscow a month later and began working at the SOVA Center, collecting data on xenophobia and radical nationalist groups while also doing translation work for the Center's publications.
I deliberated over the title with my academic supervisor at the University of Pittsburgh just before I presented my research there. It's technically a misnomer, as the research itself has nothing to do with cartography or GIS-analysis. The main point of the title was to indicate two things: first, that the project would (eventually) include spatial analyses incorporating various GIS-techniques, and second, that the overall goal was to perform something of a survey – a comprehensive set of analyses – of the various elements and dynamics of xenophobia in Russia, thereby ‘mapping’ it and its dimensions in a rather abstract way.
— Did you happen upon something in the media or on social media? Have you seen cases of it yourself?
— In order to complete the project, I ended up reading plenty of mass media sources and some social media sources. I was careful to take into consideration any biases held by the various pieces I read, and I tried to expose myself to a diverse array of articles and other publications. Ultimately, the vast majority of the information and data that I used came from the SOVA Center.
— Did you have a chance to interview anyone taking part in the violent anti-migrant protests in Moscow?
— Unfortunately, no. I read about all of these incidents from a distance, that is, while I was in the U.S. But I never collected any primary data of my own through interviews or surveys.
The foremost reason I decided to study Russian is that I find it to be the single most beautiful language I've ever heard or even read. I've been exposed to many languages over the years, but I find Russian to be melodic and soothing.
— What are some of the main conclusions you have drawn on this issue?
— The research I did only scratches the surface of the issue, which means just as many questions arose as conclusions were made. Nevertheless, my general conclusions consist of the following:
First, when it comes to non-fatal attacks, youth subculture groups and anti-fascist groups suffer the greatest share of violence. Second, it seems that xenophobic violence does not vary significantly across various types of victims in the context of fatal attacks, nor does xenophobic violence vary greatly across the seasons of the year. Third, when analyzing xenophobic violence across geospatial dimensions, it would be more useful to focus on specific regions or cities; otherwise, it would be difficult to control for the disparity in population sizes between Russia's largest cities and other regions. Finally, policymakers would do well to focus their attention on framing anti-extremism policy according the following criteria regarding radical nationalist groups: interregional and/or national organizations, movements, or coalitions that refer to themselves as social, social-political, all-Russian, or ultra-radical; that use websites, newspapers, or blogs; and that rely on Tsarist, National Socialist, and/or communist symbols.
— How was it that you came to learn Russian?
— Much of my studies in Russian have been through formal instruction at two universities: Samford University in Birmingham, Alabama and the University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. I studied for two years at Samford and one year at Pitt. I also studied advanced Russian at Moscow State University in summer 2014 when I travelled to Moscow for an eleven-week work/study programme with the School of Russian and Asian Studies (SRAS).
Otherwise, I've learned Russian simply by absorbing it casually through leisure reading, media, and conversation. The foremost reason I decided to study Russian is that I find it to be the single most beautiful language I've ever heard or even read. I've been exposed to many languages over the years, but I find Russian to be melodic and soothing. All in all, Russian is a very rich and formidable language, and I knew from the beginning that no language is worth the trouble if it isn't pleasing in the ears and on the tongue of the learner.
— How do you enjoy living and studying in Moscow? What are the top five places you like to go?
— I love Moscow. I simply love it. I don't love it because it's nice; rather, I love it because there's so much potential, development, and growth going on right now, and I want to be part of it. My top five places are Vorobyovy Gori/Park Kultury, Moscow State University, the entire area around HSE at 20 Myasnitskaya, Chistiye Prudy, and the area around Tretyakovskaya.
— What would be your message to your friends at the University of Pittsburgh? How would you describe your international experience, and would you recommend other international students also come to study in one of the Master’s programmes at HSE?
— For people who like or love Russia or Eurasia, the obvious choice is to come to Moscow and study at HSE. I pride myself in being a global citizen, and that's a status that I would love for every person to obtain. Coming to study at HSE is definitely a great way to realize it. I would recommend anyone to come to Moscow and study at HSE – quite honestly anyone.
The Population and Development programme has met and exceeded my expectations in many regards. The quality of the instruction is high, the rigor of the coursework is considerable enough. I have been quite impressed with most of our professors. My original primary goal was to get back to Moscow for the long term. I found this programme and instantly realized that it would be a very valuable step into the job market (in the area of research and analysis) in Moscow. The PaD programme quickly became my foremost priority – even beyond job applications in the US and federally funded study abroad programs.
I can say that I benefit from the quality of the instruction and the both deep and broad knowledge of our professors. I also benefit from the networking, work, and research opportunities that come from being taught by researchers at the Institute of Demography at the Higher School of Economics. The programme is a highly functional mixture of several critical disciplines – public policy, economics, and demography. I also like that, because HSE is a research institution with such constituent research bodies as the Institute of Demography, we have direct access to some amazing resources and opportunities to apply our skills in research and analysis.
Anna Chernyakhovskaya, specially for HSE News service
The number of older persons and their life expectancy are on the rise in many countries worldwide. As they age, some people need assistance with daily living activities, something their family is not always capable of providing. This creates a demand for professional long-term care that integrates medical and social services. How Russia can benefit from other countries' experience of providing public long-term care is discussed in a report* presented by the HSE Centre for Social Policy Studies at the XXIII Yasin International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development hosted by the HSE University.
The birthrate across Russia is not uniform: in some areas, people have children earlier in life, and in some, later. These contrasts reflect various populations’ differing demographic outlooks and the dynamics of their respective regions, as well as the extent to which their residents adhere to traditional norms of reproductive behaviour. On the whole, almost no large areas with high birthrates remain in Russia. Here, IQ.HSE studies current trends based on an article by demographer Artur Petrosyan.
In developing countries, the gap in life expectancies between men and women has been shrinking for a long time—but it has not disappeared completely. In many cases, gender-related differences in mortality in the 45–69 age group account for almost half of this gap. However, in Eastern Europe, early mortality in men aged 50 and under accounts for over a third of it. Demographer Marina Vergeles examined the situation in more than 40 countries and shared her conclusions with IQ.HSE.
The Human Capital Multidisciplinary Research Center, together with the Vishnevsky Institute of Demography and the International Laboratory for Population and Health, organized the first demographic readings in memory of HSE University Professor Anatoly Vishnevsky, the first director of the Institute. The experts in attendance discussed a wide range of topics, including family policy, how to improve the conditions of low-income people, and how to correct market and employment setbacks.
Karina Kuzhanova, third-year student at the Faculty of Law, and Anna Yatsenko, second-year student at the Faculty of Economic Sciences, moved to Moscow from Kazakhstan to study at HSE University. They shared their impressions of studies and student life with the HSE News Service, as well as talking about some of the most inspirational things in the Russian capital.
Women are more likely to live to old age because they are less prone to indulge in bad habits than men. A whole range of social, biological and other factors—such as women being more likely to visit the doctor and exercise—also play an important role. Experts from HSE University and RANEPA analyzed the effects of various factors on the reduction in men's life expectancy, which varies based on habits and ideas about male behavior in different countries.
In Soviet times, relocation to northern monocities was seen as an attractive option, with high pay and good perks, along with a well-developed infrastructure, perceived as offsetting the harsh climate. The situation is different today, with some cities on the verge of vanishing into extinction. A prominent and rather striking example of this process is Vorkuta in the Komi Republic. A team of researchers from the HSE and Politecnico di Milano, having examined the progressive shrinkage of this once booming monocity, concluded that the case of Vorkuta could suggest effective approaches to managing urban depopulation in the Russian Arctic.
Over the past quarter-century, the socially accepted reproductive norm has hardly changed in Russia: most people still believe that two children per family is the ideal. The reality, however, is more diverse, and both largeand childfree families are increasingly commonplace. A new study by HSE demographers looks at changes in public opinion in Russia between 1995 and 2019 concerning the optimal number of children in the family.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, people around the world have faced an unprecedented crisis. The cataclysm has impacted Russia as well. Who will better deal the hardships—experienced baby boomers, Gen Xers who survived the 1990s, or Gen Yers who have had an easy life?
Most Russians would like to have two children: a boy and a girl. The others fall between the two extremes of either wanting no children (at least for now) or planning to have three or more. Having a large family is often associated with affluence. The reasons for having another child are many, from wishing to strengthen the family bond and teach older children to care for younger siblings to hoping that the maternity subsidy may help the family improve their housing situation. A HSE demographer used data from a sample of 15,000 respondents to study reproductive attitudes in Russia.