Drawn by Moscow’s Cultural Appeal, U.S. Student Chooses HSE to Embark on Research Career
On January 29, Thomas Espy, a student in the Population and Development Master’s programme at HSE, presented a report entitled ‘Mapping Xenophobia in Russia’. During his presentation, he highlighted his paper’s linear analysis of xenophobic attacks in the Russian Federation and a network analysis focusing on nationalist groups, as well as recommended areas of focus for Russian policymakers.
Although his first attempt to learn Russian as a teenager failed, Thomas, originally from Alabama, has long been drawn by Russian language and culture. He eventually learned the language and acquired experience living and studying in Russia. While completing his undergraduate studies at the University of Pittsburgh, he decided to embark on a research career in Moscow, a decision which led him to enrol in the Master’s programme in Population and Development at HSE.
He agreed to speak with the HSE news service about his recent presentation, his research interests and how he finds life in Russia.
— How did you choose the topic of your presentation, ‘Mapping Xenophobia in Russia’?
— I began studying xenophobia in Russia around September 2012 when I started on my Bachelor's thesis. By the end of the project, I felt I had discovered a new academic passion. I returned to this topic in spring 2014, when I attempted to do a series of quantitative analyses on some data from the SOVA Center for Information and Analyses, the Moscow-based NGO that hosted me during my summer 2014 internship.
I was dissatisfied with the quality of my research, so I decided to delve deeper by gathering the data more directly. I travelled to Moscow a month later and began working at the SOVA Center, collecting data on xenophobia and radical nationalist groups while also doing translation work for the Center's publications.
I deliberated over the title with my academic supervisor at the University of Pittsburgh just before I presented my research there. It's technically a misnomer, as the research itself has nothing to do with cartography or GIS-analysis. The main point of the title was to indicate two things: first, that the project would (eventually) include spatial analyses incorporating various GIS-techniques, and second, that the overall goal was to perform something of a survey – a comprehensive set of analyses – of the various elements and dynamics of xenophobia in Russia, thereby ‘mapping’ it and its dimensions in a rather abstract way.
— Did you happen upon something in the media or on social media? Have you seen cases of it yourself?
— In order to complete the project, I ended up reading plenty of mass media sources and some social media sources. I was careful to take into consideration any biases held by the various pieces I read, and I tried to expose myself to a diverse array of articles and other publications. Ultimately, the vast majority of the information and data that I used came from the SOVA Center.
— Did you have a chance to interview anyone taking part in the violent anti-migrant protests in Moscow?
— Unfortunately, no. I read about all of these incidents from a distance, that is, while I was in the U.S. But I never collected any primary data of my own through interviews or surveys.
The foremost reason I decided to study Russian is that I find it to be the single most beautiful language I've ever heard or even read. I've been exposed to many languages over the years, but I find Russian to be melodic and soothing.
— What are some of the main conclusions you have drawn on this issue?
— The research I did only scratches the surface of the issue, which means just as many questions arose as conclusions were made. Nevertheless, my general conclusions consist of the following:
First, when it comes to non-fatal attacks, youth subculture groups and anti-fascist groups suffer the greatest share of violence. Second, it seems that xenophobic violence does not vary significantly across various types of victims in the context of fatal attacks, nor does xenophobic violence vary greatly across the seasons of the year. Third, when analyzing xenophobic violence across geospatial dimensions, it would be more useful to focus on specific regions or cities; otherwise, it would be difficult to control for the disparity in population sizes between Russia's largest cities and other regions. Finally, policymakers would do well to focus their attention on framing anti-extremism policy according the following criteria regarding radical nationalist groups: interregional and/or national organizations, movements, or coalitions that refer to themselves as social, social-political, all-Russian, or ultra-radical; that use websites, newspapers, or blogs; and that rely on Tsarist, National Socialist, and/or communist symbols.
— How was it that you came to learn Russian?
— Much of my studies in Russian have been through formal instruction at two universities: Samford University in Birmingham, Alabama and the University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. I studied for two years at Samford and one year at Pitt. I also studied advanced Russian at Moscow State University in summer 2014 when I travelled to Moscow for an eleven-week work/study programme with the School of Russian and Asian Studies (SRAS).
Otherwise, I've learned Russian simply by absorbing it casually through leisure reading, media, and conversation. The foremost reason I decided to study Russian is that I find it to be the single most beautiful language I've ever heard or even read. I've been exposed to many languages over the years, but I find Russian to be melodic and soothing. All in all, Russian is a very rich and formidable language, and I knew from the beginning that no language is worth the trouble if it isn't pleasing in the ears and on the tongue of the learner.
— How do you enjoy living and studying in Moscow? What are the top five places you like to go?
— I love Moscow. I simply love it. I don't love it because it's nice; rather, I love it because there's so much potential, development, and growth going on right now, and I want to be part of it. My top five places are Vorobyovy Gori/Park Kultury, Moscow State University, the entire area around HSE at 20 Myasnitskaya, Chistiye Prudy, and the area around Tretyakovskaya.
— What would be your message to your friends at the University of Pittsburgh? How would you describe your international experience, and would you recommend other international students also come to study in one of the Master’s programmes at HSE?
— For people who like or love Russia or Eurasia, the obvious choice is to come to Moscow and study at HSE. I pride myself in being a global citizen, and that's a status that I would love for every person to obtain. Coming to study at HSE is definitely a great way to realize it. I would recommend anyone to come to Moscow and study at HSE – quite honestly anyone.
The Population and Development programme has met and exceeded my expectations in many regards. The quality of the instruction is high, the rigor of the coursework is considerable enough. I have been quite impressed with most of our professors. My original primary goal was to get back to Moscow for the long term. I found this programme and instantly realized that it would be a very valuable step into the job market (in the area of research and analysis) in Moscow. The PaD programme quickly became my foremost priority – even beyond job applications in the US and federally funded study abroad programs.
I can say that I benefit from the quality of the instruction and the both deep and broad knowledge of our professors. I also benefit from the networking, work, and research opportunities that come from being taught by researchers at the Institute of Demography at the Higher School of Economics. The programme is a highly functional mixture of several critical disciplines – public policy, economics, and demography. I also like that, because HSE is a research institution with such constituent research bodies as the Institute of Demography, we have direct access to some amazing resources and opportunities to apply our skills in research and analysis.
Anna Chernyakhovskaya, specially for HSE News service
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, people around the world have faced an unprecedented crisis. The cataclysm has impacted Russia as well. Who will better deal the hardships—experienced baby boomers, Gen Xers who survived the 1990s, or Gen Yers who have had an easy life?
Most Russians would like to have two children: a boy and a girl. The others fall between the two extremes of either wanting no children (at least for now) or planning to have three or more. Having a large family is often associated with affluence. The reasons for having another child are many, from wishing to strengthen the family bond and teach older children to care for younger siblings to hoping that the maternity subsidy may help the family improve their housing situation. A HSE demographer used data from a sample of 15,000 respondents to study reproductive attitudes in Russia.
Citing data from Russia’s largest international sampling study, HSE demographers have shown that women are more likely than men to consider divorce and are more determined to end their marriage. They also found that young couples are more likely to be unhappy with their relationship. The report was prepared for the XXI April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development at HSE University.
Getting an education and a job, leaving the parental home and starting a family are some of the the milestones of growing up. For Russians in their thirties today, these stages do not necessarily follow a pre-set sequence and often overlap. In contrast to their parents, linear and predictable biographies are increasingly rare among Russian millennials, whose lives tend to look more like a patchwork of diverse events than a straight line. Some of these events, especially childbirth, often get postponed until later in life. For young Russians today, having children tends to be the last stage in their own transition to maturity, according to demographer Ekaterina Mitrofanova.
More than 500 large families in three Russian federal districts were surveyed to explore reasons why couples choose to have many children. Five main patterns were identified, driven by values (partner trust and religious beliefs), socioeconomic circumstances (income and education), and availability of support from extended family and friends.
Russia has just had a great contraceptive revolution, and it is not over: unwanted pregnancies are more often prevented than terminated. Russians now engage in family planning with more confidence: the number of births is almost equal to the number of pregnancies. On the basis of studies completed by HSE demographers, IQ.HSE examines the Soviet and Russian culture of birth control.
Russians have been estimating their general health as better over recent years, and life expectancy has been growing. Meanwhile, Russia is still falling behind EU countries according to this indicator. Alexander Ramonov, researcher from the HSE Institute of Demography, studied the reasons for this.
Reproductive behavior is modernizing at different rates in post-Soviet countries. Things are changing faster in Russia, Armenia, Georgia and Ukraine, where, over the last fifteen years, the average maternity age has increased and the contribution of women in their thirties to their countries’ birthrates has grown. Meanwhile, old reproductive patterns persist in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, where firstborns are usually born to parents under 30, demographers Vladimir Kozlov and Konstantin Kazenin note in a paper delivered at HSE’s XX April International Academic Conference.
More than half of school graduates in medium-sized Russian cities will change their place of residence either forever or at least for a long time. According a report on internal migration presented by HSE demographers at the XX April International Academic Conference, these people are lost to their cities.
Demographers have created a detailed colour map of population ageing in European countries; a collection of demographic stories, it uses colour coding to indicate the varying stages of population ageing across Europe. By looking at the map, you can easily spot areas with a higher concentration of older people, countries with the youngest populations and the main destinations for workforce flows. The map's author Ilya Kashnitsky comments on some of the demographic stories it tells.