• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Upcoming Neuroeconomics Symposium Aims to Share New Research and Build International Collaboration

Upcoming Neuroeconomics Symposium Aims to Share New Research and Build International Collaboration

© HSE University

On September 23-24, the CCCP19 Symposium ‘Cognition, Computation, Neuroeconomics and Performance’ will be held at HSE University. The goal of the symposium is to exhibit cutting edge research at the CCDM, a leading cognitive neuroscience research centre in Russia, and LNC2, a leading European research centre in neuroeconomics, cognitive neuroscience and neural theory. Ahead of CCCP19, the HSE News Service spoke with the conference organizer and several invited speakers about the plan for this symposium and the importance of their research in the field.

The event is a collaboration between the Centre for Cognition and Decision Making (CCDM) at the Higher School of Economics, the Laboratory for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience (LNC2) at the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience (ICN) and the Laboratoire des Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationelles at the Department of Cognitive Studies, Ecole Normale Superieure (Paris, France). CCCP19 follows a tradition of CCCP conferences that have taken place annually over the past six years.

This year’s focus, neuroeconomics, is a burgeoning field that aims to combine the methods of economics, behavioural economics and neuroscience to understand the basis of human economic behaviour. Research in neuroeconomics uses a wide variety of modern methods, including computational modelling, non-invasive brain stimulation, and functional imaging.

This is the first seminar on neuroeconomics to be held jointly with École Normale Supérieure (ENS). How did this scientific partnership develop?

Vasilisa Skvortsova (Organizer, Post-doctoral fellow at the Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL University, Paris, France): Although the partnership between ENS and CCDM started several years ago, this seminar extends this collaboration by inviting new team leaders and young LNC2 and CCDM members (PhD students and post-doctoral fellows) to present their work on decision-making and neuroeconomics. When I visited the CCDM last year, I realized that there are a lot of intersection points between research at the CCDM and at the LNC2 but that there is a lack of knowledge sharing, particularly among young researchers. This is where the idea of this year symposium was born.

Valentin Wyart (Invited speaker, Inserm, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL University, Paris, France): Grounding neuroeconomics in existing theories of human cognition is a direction that could foster its development in my opinion. A large share of research in neuroeconomics relies on purely behavioural economics-based theories and ignores very relevant knowledge about attention, learning, memory and decision-making beyond economics that has been gathered in cognitive psychology and neuroscience over the past several decades. I would be very interested in discussing the possible ways by which neuroeconomics researchers could inform their theoretical models and experimental paradigms using research in human cognition.

What is most relevant today in the development and study of neuroeconomics?

Vasilisa: I see the key points of the discussion centred on how we make our decisions and learn in complex environments and what the possible neurobiological origins of these decisions are. The complexity of the environment comes in different forms. It could be its volatility – the unexpected changes that the agent has to adapt to. It could also be a social or informational context, for example, the number of options given to choose from or the type of alternative proposed. Finally, it could come from the complexity of the internal beliefs of the decision-maker, for example, holding conflicting beliefs that must be resolved before making a decision). 

At the methodological level, it would be very interesting to see how each of the groups could use the methodology of the other in their research. For instance, how trans-cranial magnetic stimulation – where Vasily Klucharev and his group are true experts – could be used to study decision variability in the task proposed by Stefano and Valentin or by applying new mathematical models to study cognition.   

Stefano Palminteri (Invited speaker, Inserm, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL University, Paris, France): One of the important fields in neuroeconomics is to understand cognitive biases. What we call cognitive bias is a systematic deviation from rationality or normative judgement. Economists assume that an agent makes her choices rationally. However, in reality, humans are far from being rational. For example,  it is well known that a lot of individuals are risk-averse: between a risky gamble and a certain option, many individuals will choose a certain option even if its expected value is lower than the expected value of the gamble. I’m interested in other types of cognitive biases, namely, how the context in which we have to make a choice changes the valuation process. For example, if you are in Italy, you might be very picky when choosing where to take your coffee and you will value a cup of coffee from a vending machine very little. However, if you are driving at night in the middle of the forest and are feeling sleepy, this cup of coffee will be of very high value.

This relative valuation process is present not only in humans but in other species. I’m particularly interested in the neurocomputational mechanics of this relative valuation process. For example, I found that choosing from experience (by trial and error as all animals do) is different from choosing from description (like in most of the economic tasks in humans) and the relative evaluation process differs.

What are your research interests in neuroeconomics?

Valentin: I think that understanding the computations governing economic choices requires understanding the sources of decision inconsistency. In other words, why do people choose differently in the same circumstances – not only in everyday life but also in controlled conditions in the laboratory.

My current research investigates the contribution of different sources of decision inconsistency under uncertainty. In contrast to existing theories that explain human inconsistencies in terms of an exploration-exploitation trade-off, my group has recently shown that most inconsistencies arise from the limited precision of reinforcement learning in the human brain. Understanding the sources of decision inconsistencies is also crucial beyond neuroeconomics for clinicians - to characterize disorders of decision-making in psychiatric conditions such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Stefano: The field of neuroeconomics, although relatively recent, is nonetheless quite vast. This is a truly interdisciplinary field as it attracts attention from researchers in neuroscience, cognition, machine learning and economics. I am particularly interested in the computational cognitive neuroscience part where we try to provide mechanistic models of decision-making (in contrast to normative or descriptive models). This means that we’ll be able to trace all the steps that lead to a decision in the way it happens in real life. 

Beyond exhibiting new research, the event also aims to foster further collaboration between CCDM and LNC2. Significant links between these two centres of excellence already exist. For example, Boris Gutkin, a team leader at LNC2, is also a leading scientist at CCDM where he has directed the Neural Theory Group for the past six years; Etienne Koechlin, head of LNC2, is a member of the Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience (ICN) and the CDM Advisory Council. Additionally, several joint doctoral projects are in the development. Recently, a new ERASMUS+ network project to develop curricula in cognitive neuroscience has been approved; Boris Gutkin is the coordinator of the project, and CCDM-ICN-HSE is a major partner.

 

See also:

Cognitive Reappraisal of Negative Emotions Can Help Manage Stress

Researchers at the HSE International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology assessed the effectiveness of two strategies for regulating emotions: reappraisal and suppression. Having analysed data on the electrical activity of 60 individuals’ brains, the scientists discovered that both approaches put additional strain on the nervous system. It was also found that individuals who are prone to emotional contagion tend to be more effective in using reappraisal and managing negative emotions. The paper has been published in Experimental Brain Research.

Russian Researchers Unveil Mechanism Underlying Language Processing Disruptions in Epilepsy Patients

Researchers at HSE University and the Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Centre have examined alterations induced by epilepsy in the language-related neural network within the brain. Using graph-based analysis, the researchers studied fMRI data from 28 patients and found that in epilepsy, both hemispheres of the brain become activated during language processing and short connections form between the hemispheres, while long connections within one hemisphere are disrupted. The study has been published in Epilepsy&Behavior.

HSE Creates ‘Transfer of Neurocognitive Technologies’ Consortium

HSE, the Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Centre, and the Centre for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation of the Moscow Healthcare Department have signed an agreement on cooperation and the creation of a ‘neuro-consortium’ under the name ‘Transfer of Neurocognitive Technologies’. The new body will boost the development and implementation of advanced solutions in neurotechnology aimed at maintaining and improving people's health. The agreement was signed for five years, and the consortium is open to new participants.

'While it May Sound Futuristic, It Holds Great Promise': Olga Dragoy Shares Her Thoughts on Language Function Restoration and the Future of Neurotechnology

In the spring of 2023, the fifth strategic project of the Priority 2030 programme, 'Human Brain Resilience: Neurocognitive Technologies for Adaptation, Learning, Development and Rehabilitation in a Changing Environment,' was launched at HSE University. The strategic project brings together researchers from all campuses of HSE University. In her interview with the HSE News Service, Olga Dragoy, head of the strategic project and Director of the HSE Centre for Language and Brain, shares an overview of the advanced technologies neuroscientists are creating today, the underlying inspiration driving these efforts, and the operational dynamics of interdisciplinary applied projects.

‘It Was Great to Look at Scientific Achievements through the Eyes of a Journalist, not a Scientist’

HSE University in Nizhny recently hosted the 2nd Autumn Neuro-linguistic School ‘NeuroSciCom: Popularising Language and Brain Studies’ for scientists and students at the HSE Centre for Language and Brain Studies in Nizhny Novgorod. The school was held as part of the 'Human Brain Resilience: Neurocognitive Technologies for Adaptation, Learning, Development and Rehabilitation in a Changing Environment' Strategic Project of the Priority 2030 programme.

The Brain Is a Network of Networks. Scientists Have Found a Way to Unravel Them

A team of researchers from HSE University and the Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (AIRI) have demonstrated the effectiveness of the PSIICOS method they had previously developed for non-invasive mapping the neural networks in the brain based on its electrical activity. Unlike other methods, it does not search for individual neuronal sources to be then combined into networks but instead looks directly for the functional networks of interconnected neuronal populations—and does so swiftly and accurately. The study findings have been published in NeuroImage.

HSE Neuroscientists Use Neural Network to Enhance Neurofeedback Technology

Researchers from HSE University and the Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (AIRI) have successfully lowered the latency between a change in brain activity and the presentation of the corresponding neurofeedback signal by a factor of 50. The results were obtained by employing a neural network trained in low-latency filtering of brain activity signals from diverse individuals. This approach opens up new prospects for the treatment of attention deficit disorder and epilepsy. A paper with the study findings has been published in Journal of Neural Engineering.

Online Rhythmic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Can Reveal the Precise Moment When Preferences Shift in the Human Brain

Cognitive dissonance is a complex and multifaceted psychological phenomenon that arises in challenging decision-making scenarios. Multiple regions of the brain participate in its occurrence, yet the neurodynamics of underlying cognitive mechanisms remain a subject of debate. Researchers from the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience have proposed the use of online transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to participants as they were actively engaged in tasks, to pinpoint the moment of cognitive dissonance resolution. Their findings have been published in a review paper in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

HSE University Holds 10th Summer School ‘Eye-tracking in the Lab and Beyond’

This year, more than 100 students from Russia and abroad took part in the 10th summer neurolinguistic school, ‘Eye-tracking in the Lab and Beyond’. The school is held annually by the HSE Center for Language and Brain. Leading experts spoke about advanced developments and research in the field of video-oculography.

New Technologies for Preserving Brain Functions: ‘Not Magic, but Normal Engineering’

New methods of brain mapping will make it easier to identify the cortex areas responsible for speech functions and to perform operations on the brain, as well as reduce the likelihood of damage to important areas. In addition, this will allow for more frequent use of non-invasive methods for restoring speech and other functions lost due to injuries and illnesses.