About Global Leadership and Education
On September 10th the first after- summer seminar ‘Actual Research and Developments in Education’, took place as organized by the HSE Institute for Educational Studies Sir Michael Barber, member of the HSE International Advisory Committee, spoke on ‘Oceans of Innovation: the Atlantic, the Pacific, Global Leadership and the Future of Education’.
Sir Michael Barber is Chief Education Adviser to Pearson Company, and head of a global research programme on education policy and its influence on academic achievements. The seminar in which he participated was dedicated to discussing how and to where global leadership in education is shifting. The interest in this topic in Russia is very high, proved by the crowded room as well as participation by high governmental officials from the RF Ministry of Education and Science.
The world today is facing a number of almost unsolvable tasks: to provide food for the nine billion people who will inhabit the planet by 2050, to overcome poverty, to eliminate conflicts, and to sustain the environment… ‘Countries cannot face all these challenges alone: serious solutions demand reliable global leadership’, Sir Michael Barber believes. But who should it be? G8 or G20? Or even G0 – when there is no leader at all?
Over the last thousand years, global shifts in leadership have often taken place. The global economy ‘center of gravity’ which arose in the East, moved to the West (and recent world history reflects this), but starting from the 1950s it started to swing back to the Asian Pacific region.
According to the speaker, countries become global leaders thanks to their ability to find and implement the innovations necessary for their economic growth. Education plays a major role here. In ten years 30 percent of all university graduates will come from China. Seven out of the top ten countries participating in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) are Asian Pacific countries.
On the one hand, this statistic proves the global leadership should go to Asian Pacific countries. But is the region ready to take this burden? According to Sir Michael Barber, no, it is not ready. A powerful state machine administrated by a competent bureaucracy, a dominating governmental apparatus together with a culture of deep respect for the state, may be useful, but not enough for global leadership. This worked in the 20th century, but the 21st century requires innovations and a special environment for them. Asian Pacific countries will need to change their educational systems.
What should the new century’s education look like? Knowledge plus thinking plus leadership underpinned by ethics – this is the formula for success in education as promoted by Sir Michael Barber’s team.
In Asian Pacific countries, students receive excellent knowledge. Japanese, Chinese and Korean school students learn mathematics and physics perfectly, and also reach high levels of achievement in foreign languages. These countries’ results in TIMSS are good proof of this.
But as regards thinking, it is more complicated. PISA partly measures a child’s ability to think and apply knowledge in new and extraordinary situations. And here Russia’s results, for example, are somewhat poorer. How do we teach a child to think? ‘A person needs critical thinking, deductive mathematical thinking, free creative thinking, team thinking, as well as the ability to think and reach solutions under pressure and in the shortest time available’.
Leadership is an ability to influence other people and stand up for one’s point of view. According to the speaker, teaching leadership to Asian school students is particularly difficult. Young Japanese, Chinese and Koreans need to digress from rote-learning and pay attention to critical analysis. At the very least, 21st-century-education needs a universal ethical basis. People should understand each other, respect other cultures and acknowledge the values of other ethnic and religious groups.
But before implementing this formula and these ideas in children’s education, it is necessary to create a special environment to support the work of the educational system.
First, universal standards of an effective educational system are necessary. Second, the human capital in education should be of high quality. Teachers should be educated and motivated. And third, a clear and transparent organizational system is foundational for such a system.
According to Sir Michael Barber, the global problem of education development is complicated by disagreement among experts and politicians on this issue. For example, many experts are involved in hot debates about school standards. They cannot agree which is more important for studies: the teacher or the technology. Some people believe that the best education is provided at public schools, while others say that the future belongs to private schools. But those are false dichotomies, and that’s why it is necessary to try to take the best from different ideas and to think through the strategy of reform implementation.
At the end of his presentation, Sir Michael Barber said that the current situation gives Asian Pacific countries a chance to become the center of global leadership. Japanese, Korean and Chinese achievements in economics and education over the last 50 years are striking. But in order to respond to future challenges, to find solutions for the existing problems, and to really become the global leaders, the Asian Pacific region needs innovations which will be able to positively transform educational systems in its countries.
According to Igor Fedukin, Deputy Minister of Education and Science of the RF, who was one of the discussants, humanity is very likely to produce revolutions: ‘Probably, the presentiment of global changes, which Michael Barber is talking about, reflects the uncertainty which prevails in the world today and which is a bit sharper than usual’. But what does the shift of the global economic center of gravity to Asian Pacific region really mean? What can it mean for Russia? What are the mechanisms of the ongoing changes?
The second debater, Isak Froumin, Academic Supervisor of the HSE Institute for Educational Studies, mentioned that if Sir Michael Barber’s formula were implemented only partially, if knowledge were supplemented by thinking and leadership but not underpinned by ethics, ‘we shall arrive nowhere’. Another important question for Russia is: can we, not being an economic leader, be a leader in educational culture?
Viktor Bolotov, Vice President of the Russian Academy of Education, mentioned that along with many other professionals in Russia, he hates the word ‘innovation’: ‘We have drowned this word in empty talk. Our new standards talk about ethics, thinking and leadership. And there are even many reports that the new standards have already been implemented! But all we have is imitation and profanation of innovation implementation.’
According to Irina Abankina, Director of the Institute for Educational Studies, ‘the speaker mentioned the drivers of global shifts and leadership. But there are also anti-drivers, they exist and they are very powerful. Today we see a massive counteraction to any reforms, a preference to preserve the status quo. Hence there is this feeling that we are moving not to progress, but to regression… We really see the false dichotomies mentioned by Michael Barber, but it is far more difficult to combine them into one in reality than to talk about the idea in a discussion’.
Alina Ivanova, specially for the HSE News Service
Attitudes towards education are often inherited, with parents explaining to their children what university education can give them. They offer very pragmatic arguments—that higher education ensures a more successful career, interesting work and a good income. But there are also other arguments that should not be underestimated. At this time when many universities are holding open house, IQ.HSE draws on a study by HSE scholars Tatiana Chirkina and Amina Guseynova to explain the attitudes towards education that parents give their children and which considerations they might have overlooked.
Students can learn difficult material much more efficiently by collaborating than by studying individually. They help each other, share information, and build collective knowledge. However, things are not as simple as they may seem. Cooperation between students is effective for certain activities, but not others. As researchers from the HSE Institute of Education have shown, knowledge is absorbed more effectively through group work, but the same benefits are not found when it comes to the practical application of knowledge.
On December 1, key areas of HSE University’s recently adopted strategy were presented at the extended meeting of the International Advisory Committee. Outgoing and new members of IAC learnt more about the University’s initiatives in human capital and AI research, as well as about its plans to build a Master’s Engineering School.
Women typically earn 18%-20% less than men do with the same education, profession and personal characteristics, researchers from the Higher School of Economics found using data from an employment survey of young personnel. What’s more, this income gap has a cumulative effect, growing wider the longer a woman works. Education, however, significantly compensates for this ‘penalty’. IQ.HSE examined this issue with the help of a study by Margarita Kiryushina and Victor Rudakova.
‘The Expertise of Members of IAC Will Be Instrumental in the Continuing Development of the University’
On October 5, HSE University’s International Advisory Committee held an online session. Yaroslav Kuzminov, HSE University Academic Supervisor, introduced the new leadership structure of the University and Rector Nikita Anisimov spoke about his vision for HSE University’s development. Meeting participants discussed various aspects of the University strategy.
Teaching is a stressful job, and with schools and universities operating remotely over the last eighteen months, teachers’ worries have increased dramatically. In the latest in a series of articles on distance learning, IQ.HSE reports on research conducted by the HSE University Institute of Education on how teachers have been coping with stress.
HSE University researchers have analyzed the economic performance of almost a hundred countries to understand whether government investment in education pays off. The economists explain what kind of recommendations may be offered to governments—and how they vary based on a country's level of development—in the Voprosy Statistiki journal
On August 12, the Territory of Ideas all-Russia youth education forum will come to a close in the town of Solnechnogorsk in the Moscow region. HSE Rector Nikita Anisimov spoke at the fifth session of the forum, declaring this year’s admissions campaign to be the most successful in the university’s history.
‘Up and Ahead’: Students in New Master's Programme to Study Psychometrics and Developmental Sciences
Enrolment is underway for the HSE Institute of Education’s new Master's programme, Science of Learning and Assessment, which was developed at the intersection of developmental science, advanced methods of neuroscience and psychometrics, and the theory and practice of testing and measurement. Students will learn to assess human development and adjust the learning process, relying on evidence-based approaches of neuroscience and current concepts of measuring skills, personality characteristics, competencies, and other complex constructs.
Educational inequality is a universal problem, but it manifests itself in different countries in different ways. Comparing the issue across different contexts is always interesting—even more so if the person doing the comparing has a diverse set of examples to draw upon. Adam Gemar earned his Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in the US before earning his Doctoral degree at Durham University (UK). Now he is a Postdoctoral Fellow at HSE University’s Institute of Education, where he is studying educational inequality in Russia with the Centre for Cultural Sociology. In his interview, he spoke about his research, life in Moscow, and Russian winters.