Economists and Researchers Gather at International Conference on Wealth and Income in Eastern Europe and CIS Countries
On September 17-18, HSE University hosted a special conference with the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth (IARIW) on the topic of Experiences and Challenges in Measuring Income and Wealth in Eastern Europe and CIS Countries. This was the first IARIW conference to be held in a CIS country. HSE News Service spoke with American economist Barbara Fraumeni about her work with economic accounting and human capital and her experience attending the conference in Moscow.
In addition to a biennial general conference held in even-numbered years, the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth (IARIW) holds special conferences in odd-numbered years that focus on specific regions. This year’s special conference, held with the support from Interstate Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS Stat) and the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation (Rosstat), focused on issues related to national accounts, prices, productivity, income and wealth distribution, poverty, and economic wellbeing in Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Participants examined past experiences, presented analyses, and identified future measurement challenges. The conference drew economists and researchers from Eastern Europe, countries of the CIS, as well as North America, Europe, and Asia.
© Mikhail Dmitriev/ HSE University
Dr Barbara Fraumeni, a member and former president of the IARIW
The IARIW, which hosts this conference, is really the field organization for people who do the things I do. There are two big groups. One group does things like income distribution, inequality, and well-being, using very micro data. And then you have my half which is more focused on productivity, economic growth. While we also use detailed data, we do not use data that is at the one-person level, so there are really two sides to it. As a former chair of the IARIW, I very much enjoy coming to these conferences and I’ve known Professor Ilya Voskovoynikov, the co-organizer of this event from HSE, for a number of years. So that’s why I’ve decided to take part.
One purpose of this conference is to provide opportunities for people to present this type of research. Economic accounting is not a ‘sexy’ area of research
It is not even included in the US listing of all the different areas in economics—a list that includes probably 500 categories. So to have an opportunity to come here and present your work in this area and to hear other people who are the experts who can expose you to what you might be able to do and then to get you excited about doing it in the future is a wonderful thing. At the conference we had about 200 people, which is a very high number. Usually at these types of conferences there are about 100.
I have worked with students from the former Soviet Union at the Muskie School, so I have some interest in this area. There was a talk on the history of the Soviet Union that was fascinating. I don’t have any papers on Russia or the former USSR - I’ve never covered those areas.
So listening to presenters here, I began to wonder about how much data there is available for studying human capital in Russia
I served as a discussant for productivity-related papers here at the conference. I reviewed a paper on Poland, and I reviewed a paper comparing India to Russia. The diversity of what’s going on still is what’s interesting. I went to all the sessions and enjoyed them thoroughly, including the ones on wealth distribution and inequality.
Not a Typical Economist
I’m not a typical economist. A typical economist uses a lot of econometrics—mathematical modelling where you try to predict based on certain variables that you have. I don’t do that. I tell people I’m an economist-accountant - I just use the numbers; they have to be put together in particular ways, so there is math behind it, but very few economists do what I do.
My main research interest is human capital, which is something I worked on with Professor Dale Jorgenson of Harvard University a long time ago. What I mean by human capital is what you get when you take everybody in the country and look at a range of factors—their current education and their expected future education, how long they’re expected to live (birth rates, etc.), whether they expected to work, both now and in the future, and so on—and you determine their current income and can predict their expected income for their whole lifetime. You can do this even for someone who has even just been born.
But since you’re doing this for the future, you have to, as they say, discount it to the present. For example, if you got $10,000 today or $10,000 in five years, you would always take $10,000 today because you could invest it and earn interest. But if you reverse that process, you would need whatever that might be—let’s say, $8,000 today—to have the equivalent of $10,000 five years from now. That means that the future incomes are worth less today. So you do all that and you basically have a summary of the potential of the whole country.
Because of data limitations, however, except for a few countries, such as the US, I don’t look at economic activity for which people aren’t paid. So, except for in the US, I don’t look at the value of taking care of children or cooking or even leisure time – everybody needs some leisure time. In Russia, for example, there’s no way I would be able to do that extension. But I do believe that extension is very important.
In fact, I got into human capital because I believe that the rate of growth of GDP was being over-estimated
In the US, by 1980, women were moving into the labour force at higher rates. But what was really happening was that their economic activity was just switching from the home to the marketplace, so to speak, so it looked like GDP was really growing. However, if you took the total amount of economic activity, while it was indeed increasing a little bit due to hired babysitters or families’ eating out more, the level of economic activity in actuality hadn’t gone up that much.
So I think it’s really important to count the stuff that you do when you’re not being paid to do it. It just takes a lot more data to do that. So, that’s the longer story I guess. This is the Jorgenson-Fraumeni approach to human capital. Today our approach is one of two methodologies used by the World Bank.
Introducing the Jorgenson-Fraumeni Approach to China
My work in China began completely independently of my university work in the US. How it all came about was a graduate student in Beijing emailed me a question. There was a typo in one of my papers and she didn’t understand something in the paper as a result of that. And she immediately invited me to come to Beijing. So I said, sure. During my visit, I toured around, because I assumed I would never be back to China.
Later, however, a colleague of mine established a centre, the China Center for Human Capital and Labor Market Research, at the Central University of Finance and Economics (CUFE) in Beijing. As part of his proposal for the centre, he said that the centre would produce an estimate of human capital in China. The Chinese government responded positively. However, they said that they needed an estimate not in three years but in six months, for the October anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic. So suddenly we are in panic mode. I came to China and did some presentations. It must have been in May, and they had until October. They did not tell me until about an hour or so before I was going to leave the campus to fly back to the US that they had decided to use my methodology. But I knew from talking to them that they really didn’t know how to do it—yet. So, after many, many emails back and forth—I didn’t even get a flight to come back for the release until I was convinced that they could do it sufficiently well to present—they managed to do it. There was a Nobel Prize winner at the release – it was a huge release. There were about 800 people, including Professor Jorgenson. It was a big deal. And I had the pleasure of meeting the only female member of the politburo. I was thrilled!
Dr Fraumeni is a Special-Term Professor of the Central University of Economics and Finance in Beijing, Professor Emerita of the Muskie School of the University of Southern Maine (USA), Senior Fellow of Hunan University in Changsha, China, and former Chief Economist in the US Bureau of Economic Analysis in the US Department of Commerce (1999-2005).
Defenders in Football Underrated in the Transfer Market
Having analysed the statistics of players in the German Bundesliga, researchers from the HSE University Laboratory of Sports Studies found that the impact of defensive actions by players during a football match is much greater than contribution of such actions to their market value. The results of the study were published in the journal Applied Economics.
Graduate Admissions Webinars: PhD Programme in Economics
On February 1, 2023, HSE University will open admissions to its doctoral schools. The Doctoral School of Economics has held a webinar for prospective students, which attracted participants from various parts of the world. Materials and feedback from the webinar, as well as information on applications, are now available on the Faculty of Economic Sciences website.
HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences Co-Authors Intercontinental Monograph
The monograph Russian and Western Economic Thought has been published under the editorship of the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences and the University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart (Germany). Written by a selection of respected experts, the monograph examines the interrelations and mutual influence of Russian and Western economic thinking. The book is edited by Prof. Vladimir Avtonomov, HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences, and Prof. Harald Hagemann, the University of Hohenheim.
Incompatible Alternatives: HSE Researchers on the Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-first Century Economy
Ambivalence and a combination of contradictory principles are vividly manifested in the actions of government, its individual agents and institutions, as well as the everyday practices of economic subjects and citizens. The participants of the HSE Laboratory for Studies in Economic Sociology seminar discussed the book The Ambivalence of Power in the Twenty-First Century Economy: Cases from Russia and Beyond, recently published in the UK. Prepared by researchers from HSE University and foreign universities, the book focuses on the study of ambivalence in Russia and beyond.
The Informal Economy and Post-Soviet Transition
The informal economy is a global phenomenon found in both developed and developing countries. There remains no consensus among academics about how the informal sector impacts overall economic growth. Elena Kalmychkova and Alexander Lipanov of Lomonosov Moscow State University and HSE University examined the informal economic sectors of former Soviet republics and found that regardless of any potential negative impact, these informal economies eventually helped people adapt to a post-transition free market environment.
Russians Feel Disappointed with Their Income if Their Reference Group Average is Higher
Researcher Anastasia Dubnovitskaya of HSE University has studied the impact of social comparison on the level of Russians' pay satisfaction. The study used data from the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey — HSE University (RLMS-HSE) from 2002 to 2018. It turned out that the main contribution to Russians' pay satisfaction is the difference between their actual pay and the average wages of the reference group — people with similar characteristics. The size of one's own wages was of secondary importance.
Anti-lectures, Cake and Soap Bubbles: HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences Celebrates Its 30th Anniversary
This year’s jubilee programme of Economfest turned out to be particularly eventful. Congratulations from university leaders, meetings with teachers, games, contests, quizzes, a job exchange with KPMG and Changellenge, as well as popcorn, cotton candy and cake were prepared for students, applicants and guests of HSE University.
Eurasian Barriers: Obstacles to International Economic Integration in the Post-Soviet Space
The creation of the Customs Union and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) contributed to the development of mutual trade between their member countries. That process picked up pace significantly starting in 2019. Still, it is too early to say that the efforts by EAEU member states to achieve economic integration have been an unqualified success. This problem is the focus of a joint report that a group of experts from Russia (HSE), Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan presented at the XXIII Yasin International Academic Conference organised by HSE University in April.
Pivot to the East: A Comprehensive Study of the Cultural and Civilisational Centres of the Non-Western World is the Top Priority
China and the Chinese world, South Asia, Southeast Asia, the Arab countries, Iran, Turkey, Central Asia and Africa are gaining new significance in Russia’s foreign policy. However, we do not know enough about the Eastern countries. It is necessary to change the priorities in education, starting from grammar school. Prospects for the development of domestic Oriental studies in the context of the new stage in the development of the system of international relations were discussed at a round table at HSE University.
‘I Admire HSE Students’ Eagerness to Learn, to Discuss, to Broaden Their Perspectives’
Robert Romanowski was a ‘Digital Professor’ at HSE University in November 2021. In his interview for the HSE News Service, he talked about the specifics of online teaching, his course on Strategic Branding, and the skills that are essential for marketing professionals today.