• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

'Russia Has A Very Good Analytical Capability'


Interview with Ian Miles, participant of the XII International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development, Professor at the University of Manchester and Academic Supervisor of the Research Laboratory for Economics of Innovation which was created last year as part of the HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge.

—Why did you decide to move to the HSE? Why is our university interesting for you?

—We have had a collaboration with people at the HSE for quite a few years now. We began by talking informally, we’ve had a number of exchanges, mutual visits, discussing topics which are very much at the heart of my interests and the interests of other colleagues in Manchester as well: foresight studies, innovation research, innovation policy and evaluation issues. We had developed a habit of collaborating over quite a few years. And my reasons for coming here are several: first of all, the people that I’ve met were clearly very, very active, they had a very substantial amount of research that they were conducting, they had very good sources of data and they were doing very clever things with the work. So I was naturally interested in collaborating with them.

I also must confess, and this is my fault, I know very little about modern Russia. And this was a great opportunity to find out more about Russia. Though Russia is quite close to Britain, I actually knew more about Korea and Japan and Australia than I knew about Russia. So it was a really good experience.

—What are the key topics of the research you are going to provide in the new laboratory?

—We are going to be studying a whole range of different issues around innovation. One thing we will be looking at is technology-based innovation, this is fundamentally important to modern economies. But we will also be looking at broader dimensions of innovation, and the word ‘economics’ tells us this – a lot of innovation activities are a matter of economic decisions, a lot of the consequences of innovation are economic consequences, and surrounding innovation activities there is a great deal that is very broadly economic to do with the way business activities are organized, the way the public services are organized, all sorts of issues which begin being social and management issues as well as economic issues.

When we think of innovation, often innovation involves change on many of these dimensions. So one of our jobs is to try to get a sufficiently good grasp of the way in which these different dimensions interrelate: in individual cases, over time, in different sectors of the economy, in different locations. So, that’s one sort of task – trying to understand different innovation processes, how they are managed, how they can be better managed, how we can get a better grasp on where they are going and maybe where they need to go, because there is certainly a lack of innovation in some places where we really desperately need it.

We are going to be looking at the networks they get involved in, who has to be mobilized in innovation processes, what sorts of resources are required, which may be economic resources in terms of money, which may be training and skills resources, cognitive capabilities, what we call ‘social capital’ – the networks between people, things of this sort. And again these are broader dimensions of innovation that have to be brought into play.

We’ll be working at a more micro-level looking at the performance of individual cases, individual innovations, individual firms, studying this by all sorts of means. One of these means is big survey data, and the HSE has fantastic access to data that in most countries is conducted away from universities by official government statistical agencies. The HSE has a lot of control over what data is produced and how that data is accessed and used. That means we have considerable strength in being able to do very high quality research into the determinants and consequences of innovation.

I’ve been stressing the role of firms, but there are other actors in the innovation system which we can also be looking at: universities, public research institutions of one sort or another. We can look to what role they are playing in the production and transfer of knowledge.

—What do you think about Russian prospects in innovative policy? It has been a very important topic at this conference.

—This conference has been very good for building my awareness of the topics in questioning how things are perceived in Russia. What is clear is that there is very good analytical capability, there are people who have undertaken good quality research and identified critical areas of innovation in Russia, critical gaps in the system. It’s apparent that despite having considerable strength in science, considerable human resources and considerable intellectual capabilities, Russia has not been making the mark on the world of innovation that we would expect. This is recognized and that is great. It’s recognized now and a lot of work has been put in to trying to turn the situation around. And I’m really looking forward to meeting with and working together with some of the people that are trying to achieve this end.

—Who are the people you are expecting to work with?

—Immediately here in the laboratory I’ll be working with Leonid Gokhberg, Alexander Sokolov and with about half a dozen other colleagues who have some very useful specialisms and backgrounds: people that are working on microeconomics of innovation, people who are working on innovation surveys, people who are experts in the human resource issues and the training and skills dimensions. It’s a very good and diverse team. We will have a big challenge in pooling our knowledge, in sharing the understanding and insights that each of us possesses.

—What can you say about this particular conference? What are your impressions?

—In the stream I’ve been on, I’ve been in the stream which has been dealing with science, technology and innovation issues, this has been very well organized, all of the presentations have been very high level, interesting presentations, and it is clear that every single speaker could have talked for several hours instead of just the few minutes that they were given. Certainly, me, but I believe many other people that were present, will be wanting to follow this up, wanting to read the publications that people mentioned, to look at the websites that they have presented to find out a lot more about the work that we’ve been learning about. It’s been very impressive to see the range of activities that’s been underway.

—Was there anything that you wished to add to the papers or to the topics of the research that were presented at this conference?

—The big issue in all of this sort of work is what use is being made of it. And we can create very nice research studies but they may just end up as pure publications or reports and not be put into practice. So the big challenge is seeing how the work is implemented. What we lack really is many stories of how our sorts of social research knowledge can be translated to actual practice by policy-makers or by managers in private and public firms. That is really something where I would like to hear more about people’s experiences on what works, what hasn’t worked so well and what are the success factors here.

Ekaterina Rylko, specially for the HSE News Service

See also:

‘Not Testing the Knowledge, But Testing Whether You Are Ready to Interact with Reality’

The roundtable "Teaching Economics to High School Students: Curricula, Practices, Competitions" took place as part of the XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development. Danil Fedorovykh, Deputy Vice Rector of HSE University and the President of the Executive Board of the International Economics Olympiad (IEO), initiated the session. Alexander Zhitkovskiy, Head of the Project Laboratory for Development of Intellectual Competitions in Economics (Faculty of Economic Sciences, HSE University), was the co-moderator.

The Core of the Nesting Doll: What a Comparison of the April Conference, the World Economic Forum, and the Gaidar Forum Reveals

This year the April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development took place for the twenty-second time, and, for the first time, Sberbank joined HSE University as a co-organizer of the event. Research assistants of the Economic Journalism Laboratory, headed by Nikolay Vardul, analyzed the agenda of the April Conference and compared it with those of other major forums. The findings of the study can be found among the laboratory’s publications.

The April Conference, 2021: 1,500 Participants, a Partnership with Sberbank, and an Online Format

On April 30, the XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development came to a close. This year it was organized jointly by HSE University and Sberbank, and the majority of the events were held online. HSE Vice President and Conference Programme Committee Deputy Chair Lev Yakobson spoke with HSE News Service about his initial takeaways from the event and its new format.

Russia Remains a Partner for Foreign Scientists

The XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development is drawing to a close in Moscow. In an interview with the media partner of the event, NEWS.ru, HSE University Vice Rector Ivan Prostakov spoke about how the format of the conference was organized, how the pandemic impacted the event, and how scientists and experts from different countries regard Russia.

Cyber Performance, PROK Cinema, and Digital Art: The Development of Art and Art Research in the 21st Century

From April 21 to 23, 2021, a major online conference of the HSE Art and Design School and the Doctoral School of Art and Design was held on ‘Theories and Practices of Art and Design: Sociocultural, Economic and Political Contexts.’ Experts discussed educational practices in art, its contemporary state, the impact of technology, and prospects for the art industry’s future development.

Human Capital, Innovation, and Fintech: What the Future Holds for Eurasian Integration

To what extent do the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) benefit from an open economy? What financial, scientific, and educational policy tools will contribute to the implementation of the recently approved ‘Strategic Directions for the Development of Eurasian Economic integration until 2025’? These questions were discussed by participants in a series of expert discussions at the XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development organised by HSE University and Sberbank.

Assessment of Universal Competences: New Approaches to Assessing Soft Skills

In order to remain competitive in the labour market, university graduates must be proficient not only in professional knowledge and skills, but also in a set of universal competences (UC). However, higher education systems face problems in assessing such competences due to a lack of developed approaches and methodologies. A report released by the HSE Institute of Education, ‘An Assessment of Universal Competences as Higher Education Learning Outcomes’, analyses the ways in which these challenges have been addressed in both Russia and abroad.

‘AI Will Apply to All Activities, Having a Great Effect on Economy’

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a fundamental component of many activities in economics and finance in recent years. On April 26,Panos Pardalos, Academic Supervisor at theLaboratory of Algorithms and Technologies for Networks Analysis (LATNA at HSE Nizhny Novgorod) and Distinguished Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Florida, will talk about its impact, future developments and limitations in his honorary lecture Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Economics and Finance.

What Can Make Robots More Human-like?

What is affect and why is it important for humans? How can feelings be defined and what is their relation to emotions and consciousness? What might be used in making a soft robot? Professor Antonio Damasio (University of Southern California, USA) discussed these and other questions in his honorary lecture, entitled 'Feeling, Knowing, and Artificial Intelligence'.The talk was delivered on April 16 at the at the XXII April International Academic Conference held by HSE University jointly with Sberbank.

World Bank Forecasts a Rise in Poverty

General wealth levels in Eastern Europe and Central Asia have been improving since 2012 — poverty has been decreasing. But due to COVID, global poverty levels, including those of these regions, may increase considerably for the first time in two decades. Samuel Freije-Rodriguez, Lead Economist at World Bank, talked about this at the XXII April Conference organized by HSE University and Sberbank.