• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Intellectual Capital: Measurement and Management

During the XVI April International Academic Conference HSE held a joint session on Intellectual Capital of Companies together with the European Institute of Advanced Studies in Management (Brussels). During this session, Professor Zambon of the University of Ferrara gave a keynote lecture and participated in round-table discussions on various problems associated with intellectual capital and intangible assets.

This visit marks the start of a long-term programme of cooperation with Professor Zambon and University of Ferrara which he represents. According to Irina Ivashkovskaya, Professor at the Faculty of Economics, ‘working with Professor Zambon will promote the study of the practice of using intellectual capital in Russian business, as well as conducting comparative research on its usage, assessing its contribution to companies’ efficiency, the growth in their value, the work of their board of directors, the practice of disclosing information on intellectual capital compared with European companies and companies from large countries with developing capital markets (India, Brazil, South Africa, and China). This research is currently being carried out at the International Laboratory of Intangible-driven Economy at HSE Perm, as well as at Corporate Finance Centre at HSE Moscow. Future plans include joining forces with the St. Petersburg and Perm campuses to carry out such research and organize conferences. In addition, a regular dialogue needs to be held with businesses and official insitutions on applying, analysing and appraising intellectual assets. Round tables might also be carried out with businesses on this topic.’

HSE News Service has talked to Professor Zambon about his research and the HSE April Conference.

— What are your impressions of the conference?

— This conference is obviously very large and it deals with various forefronts of academic research. In this respect it’s a really great organizational effort and at the same time a great opportunity that has been offered to not only Russian, but also international economists to confront, discuss and debate on all up-to-date issues that our economies are facing. One particular aspect I’d like to stress is the innovativeness of this particular section of the conference, the session on intellectual capital. This is clearly a new phenomenon appearing on the horizon of economic studies. Intellectual capital is an important variable and has been for a long time overlooked. I believe it could be a very fruitful topic and area for research in future, and I think this conference is doing a good job to show this.

— Would you say the value of intangible capital varies from country to country, is it, for example, a feature of post-industrial economy only or is it a global phenomenon?

— The difficulty, but also the beauty of this topic is the fact that intangible capital varies across countries, but also across territories, companies and organizations. It’s a variable that takes time to accumulate. It’s very difficult to accumulate intellectual capital in a short time, because it’s made up of different aspects, and, in particular, knowledge. We all know that knowledge is a complicated factor, but it’s fundamental for our own development on the personal level. This, of course, applies even more to nations, countries, and regions. Companies have different intellectual capital because they have different capacity of creating value and intellectual capital is linked to value creation (keeping in mind that value is not necessarily cash).

Another interesting thing is intellectual capital of territories and of nations. During my speech, I mentioned brands like ‘Made in Italy’, ‘Made in Germany’, ‘Made in Russia’ – each of these brands are public intangibles available to the community, in this case, businesses. And each of them brings different sensations, perceptions, and feelings: ‘Made in Germany’ or ‘Made in Italy’ are different.

— Can these public intangibles be built with the same tools that are used in private business?

— Yes and no. First of all, you need to raise awareness on many levels. Sometimes people talk about innovation, but they don’t ask themselves what the sources of innovation are. If you think about it, the sources of innovation are intangible, in other words, intellectual capital should be understood.

Then, intellectual capital should be managed. You clearly can’t manage a territory exactly like a company, but still the basic principles are the same: awareness, creation of capacities to develop intellectual capital, a better way to report intellectual capital, because the information about the intellectual capital is vital to take decisions. There have been studies demonstrating that companies, territories, and nations with higher intellectual capital also have higher capacity of creating value.

— How could the theory of intangible capital and resources apply to an educational institution?

— It’s interesting to know that ten years ago in Austria the state approved a law obliging Austrian universities to produce an intellectual capital report every year, in order to make an effort to show what they are doing, the impact of students, the impact of the professors etc. It’s an interesting way to show that intellectual capital applies also to non-profit organizations. Faculty qualification, papers, organizational climate – it is a comprehensive picture of what is non-financial. Of course, a university has accounts, money coming and going, but the interesting thing for a university is that the non-financial aspect is more important than financial equilibrium. That’s why the concept of intellectual capital can be very helpful to try to show some aspects that are sometimes hidden in the usual accounts.

— Are university rankings a measure of this intellectual capital?

— Yes, they are. However, here we are talking about much more articulated type of information. You have to show what you are doing with the public money and with the students’ money, and it’s healthy that you show this with a special report. But it is not just talking; the important thing is metrics accompanied with some narrative. This is a new way to look at the whole issue. It will take time because we are used to financial measures: rubles, dollars, profit, bottom line. However, to some extent, it’s illusory, because profit does not exist in practice: it’s just a calculation.

— Have you done any research using Russian data?

— Not yet, but we are talking about it with Professor Irina Ivashkovskaya. We have a number of projects connected with Russia – we are bringing here the most important academic event in Europe on intangibles next year, our interdisciplinary workshop on Intellectual Assets: Measurement and Reporting. We have been organizing it since 2005 in cooperation with the European Institute of Advanced Studies in Management. The workshop will be in Russia, probably, in Moscow. I hope also the governmental officers will understand the importance of the issue and that there will be some occasions to exchange ideas with them. In Europe there is a renewed interest in this area, particularly by the European Commission and OECD. It’s a technical topic, but it’s also has to do with soft policy, soft skills, soft parts of organizations, and we all know they are important.

Prepared by Maria Besova, HSE English language website

 

See also:

Online Master of Finance Receives CFA Institute Affiliation Program Status

The Chartered Financial Analyst Institute (CFA Institute) has recognised the HSE online Master of Finance as part of its University Affiliation Program. The status was assigned this year based on the long-standing cooperation between the CFA Institute and the HSE Banking Institute and the confidence international experts have in the quality of education at HSE.

‘Not Testing the Knowledge, But Testing Whether You Are Ready to Interact with Reality’

The roundtable "Teaching Economics to High School Students: Curricula, Practices, Competitions" took place as part of the XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development. Danil Fedorovykh, Deputy Vice Rector of HSE University and the President of the Executive Board of the International Economics Olympiad (IEO), initiated the session. Alexander Zhitkovskiy, Head of the Project Laboratory for Development of Intellectual Competitions in Economics (Faculty of Economic Sciences, HSE University), was the co-moderator.

The Core of the Nesting Doll: What a Comparison of the April Conference, the World Economic Forum, and the Gaidar Forum Reveals

This year the April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development took place for the twenty-second time, and, for the first time, Sberbank joined HSE University as a co-organizer of the event. Research assistants of the Economic Journalism Laboratory, headed by Nikolay Vardul, analyzed the agenda of the April Conference and compared it with those of other major forums. The findings of the study can be found among the laboratory’s publications.

The April Conference, 2021: 1,500 Participants, a Partnership with Sberbank, and an Online Format

On April 30, the XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development came to a close. This year it was organized jointly by HSE University and Sberbank, and the majority of the events were held online. HSE Vice President and Conference Programme Committee Deputy Chair Lev Yakobson spoke with HSE News Service about his initial takeaways from the event and its new format.

Russia Remains a Partner for Foreign Scientists

The XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development is drawing to a close in Moscow. In an interview with the media partner of the event, NEWS.ru, HSE University Vice Rector Ivan Prostakov spoke about how the format of the conference was organized, how the pandemic impacted the event, and how scientists and experts from different countries regard Russia.

Cyber Performance, PROK Cinema, and Digital Art: The Development of Art and Art Research in the 21st Century

From April 21 to 23, 2021, a major online conference of the HSE Art and Design School and the Doctoral School of Art and Design was held on ‘Theories and Practices of Art and Design: Sociocultural, Economic and Political Contexts.’ Experts discussed educational practices in art, its contemporary state, the impact of technology, and prospects for the art industry’s future development.

Human Capital, Innovation, and Fintech: What the Future Holds for Eurasian Integration

To what extent do the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) benefit from an open economy? What financial, scientific, and educational policy tools will contribute to the implementation of the recently approved ‘Strategic Directions for the Development of Eurasian Economic integration until 2025’? These questions were discussed by participants in a series of expert discussions at the XXII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development organised by HSE University and Sberbank.

Assessment of Universal Competences: New Approaches to Assessing Soft Skills

In order to remain competitive in the labour market, university graduates must be proficient not only in professional knowledge and skills, but also in a set of universal competences (UC). However, higher education systems face problems in assessing such competences due to a lack of developed approaches and methodologies. A report released by the HSE Institute of Education, ‘An Assessment of Universal Competences as Higher Education Learning Outcomes’, analyses the ways in which these challenges have been addressed in both Russia and abroad.

‘AI Will Apply to All Activities, Having a Great Effect on Economy’

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a fundamental component of many activities in economics and finance in recent years. On April 26,Panos Pardalos, Academic Supervisor at theLaboratory of Algorithms and Technologies for Networks Analysis (LATNA at HSE Nizhny Novgorod) and Distinguished Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Florida, will talk about its impact, future developments and limitations in his honorary lecture Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Economics and Finance.

What Can Make Robots More Human-like?

What is affect and why is it important for humans? How can feelings be defined and what is their relation to emotions and consciousness? What might be used in making a soft robot? Professor Antonio Damasio (University of Southern California, USA) discussed these and other questions in his honorary lecture, entitled 'Feeling, Knowing, and Artificial Intelligence'.The talk was delivered on April 16 at the at the XXII April International Academic Conference held by HSE University jointly with Sberbank.