Economics of Sport Discussed at HSE April Academic Conference
Economics of sports was one of the topics featured at the recent April Academic Conference. A section led by HSE Deputy Vice Rector Dmitry Dagaev included sessions dedicated to financial and organizational regulation, competitive balance, and determinants of success in sport. Several international scholars participated in the event. Prof. Dennis Coates, Dr. Tim Pawlowski, and Carlos Gómez González have talked to HSE News about their research interests and the importance of sports in modern global economy.
Dennis Coates, Professor of Economics at University of Maryland and Leading Research Fellow of Intangible-driven Economy Laboratory at HSE Perm
Sports as a research area
In 1995, when Professor Coates moved to Baltimore, an American football team left the city of Cleveland and moved to Baltimore. The news was full of stories about how many jobs would be created with the arrival of the football team in Baltimore. The news also reported gains in income for residents of Baltimore and increases in tax collections. ‘Because American football teams play only 8 to 12 home games I did not think it possible that the presence of the team could generate the effects that supporters of the club were claiming. Together with a colleague at the time I proceeded to estimate the impact of sports franchises and stadium and arena construction on local economies. After several papers looking at that issue in numerous ways I branched out into other areas of the business and economics of sports’.
Since 2014 Professor Coates has been a member of the International Laboratory in Intangible Driven economy at HSE in Perm. ‘I will continue working in that capacity, he says. And, through events like the April conference, I hope and expect that my work will extend to collaboration with other researchers in HSE. Perhaps the most exciting thing for me is the breadth of issues that Russian researchers are involved in and the support within HSE for pursuing those issues. While in Moscow, several of us in the sports sessions took the opportunity to attend the semi-final of the football cup in Khimki, between CSKA and Krasnodar. That was a fun and interesting experience.'
Sports in national economics
Sports is big business in many countries of the world. Russia is no exception. There is a distinction between fitness and sport; fitness is different from sport because of the benefits to physical and mental health from fitness activities. Spectator sports probably have little of those. Nonetheless, perhaps the largest impact of sports and fitness is on the quality of life of citizens. Sports can bring disparate people together when they have nothing in common. For example, the most influential politician or wealthiest businessman may have only their love of Spartak or Zenit in common with a factory worker or cab driver. As a purely monetary matter, sport and fitness are not large contributors to a national economy. While the salaries of star players are enormous compared to those of the typical worker, there are few employees of sport clubs. Fitness activities would be much larger than sport, because fitness includes many activities with large numbers of participants and many employees, especially if one includes sports equipment and sports apparel within the fitness category. But relative to grocery stores, oil companies, automobile companies, etc., both sport and fitness are tiny parts of the economy.
Sports can bring disparate people together when they have nothing in common. For example, the most influential politician or wealthiest businessman may have only their love of Spartak or Zenit in common with a factory worker or cab driver
‘For me, as someone who comes to sports economics largely from the angle of effective use of resources, the economics of sport is really a great laboratory for studying broader economic questions. For example, if one wants to study the influence of incentives on worker effort, it is difficult or even impossible to do in a traditional industry, say manufacturing. It is nearly impossible generally speaking to know the production of a specific worker in a factory. In sports however, there are numerous statistics gathered about the efforts of individual players. For example, in football one knows the goals, assists, tackles, penalties and fouls of the players. New work uses measures of distance run by a player during a match as a measure of effort. And with information on player pay and the bonuses in contracts it is possible to examine the influence of these incentives on player effort. This same approach can be extended to the influence of incentives on team decisions, fan decisions, and so on.’
Professor Tim Pawlowski, Chair in Sport Economics, Sport Management and Media Research at the University of Tübingen
He studied Economics at the University of Cologne and Sport Science at the German Sport University and was fascinated by working in the intersection of both disciplines. This is the reason why he did his PhD in Sport Economics in 2009. ‘Sport Economics is not just applying economic theories and methods to the area of sports. Rather it is about adjusting standard theories and methods and implementing new approaches to consider the peculiarities of sports. My empirical work is based on both, secondary and primary data.’
There seems to be a generally increasing interest by Russian colleagues in Sport Economics. This might be partly driven by recent and upcoming major sport events such as the 2014 Olympic Winter Games in Sotchi or the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia
As Prof Pawlowki says, sport economics research basically started several decades ago with the seminal works by Simon Rottenberg on ‘The Baseball Players’ Labor Market’ (Journal of Political Economy, 1956) and Walter Neale on ‘The Peculiar Economics of Professional Sports’ (Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1964). Since then the discipline has rapidly evolved and considers nowadays also topics beyond professional sports, such as labour market and health effects of sports participation or the effectiveness and efficiency of sports related public expenditures.
‘Broadly speaking, there are two lines of research, i.e. papers using sports data to test general economic theories and papers that make use of (modified) economic principles and methods to inform decision makers in sports and (sports) policy. There seems to be a generally increasing interest by Russian colleagues in Sport Economics. This might be partly driven by recent and upcoming major sport events such as the 2014 Olympic Winter Games in Sotchi or the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia. Empirical studies conducted in some European countries like Germany suggest that around two to three percent of the gross domestic product can be attributed to sports. However, I am not aware of related figures from Russia’.
Carlos Gómez González, University of Castilla-La Mancha
After an international exchange at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro (USA), Prof González decided that he wanted Sports Economics to be the focus of his academic career. He met professors Leonor Gallardo and Julio del Corral in Spain and started to work in the IGOID Research Group at the University of Castilla-La Mancha.
According to Prof González, sport and fitness are two sectors of the leisure industry which have an important influence on the economy of countries. For instance, the European Commission reports that the sport sector contributes with more than 2% to the European Union global gross domestic product (GDP). These sectors have experienced a fast growth during recent years because people not only watch more sport on TV or go to the stadiums, but they also practice more physical activity (e.g., jogging, swimming, cycling, fitness group activities).
In the case of the European soccer leagues, female team managers perform significantly better when having more specialized experience and in the North American basketball case, they manage to perform as good as male managers with weaker teams
Apart from the important contribution of sports to the GDP of domestic economies, this sector is growing so fast that the impact on global economics is greater every year. To understand the behavior of the population in general and sports fans in particular is key to analyze this global effect. Factors determining sports demand, efficiency of sports clubs and organizations, physical activity programs as tools to reduce costs in the health care system are just some examples of burning issues in the field.
‘The discussion at the April conference was really good. We had a great opportunity to discuss our findings on female and male coaching with some of the most important sports economists at the moment. This is a challenging answer that needs more empirical effort to be fully answered. We can argue that gender per se is not a definitive factor in coaching. However, we did find that female team managers are not underperforming when compared to their male counterparts in this particular scenario. Besides, in the case of the European soccer leagues, female team managers perform significantly better when having more specialized experience and in the North American basketball case, they manage to perform as good as male managers with weaker teams. Game is still on! Moreover, I had the chance to meet professors and other professionals working in similar ideas and exchange knowledge and opinions with them. Finally, I could also meet the fantastic research team of the International Laboratory of Intangible-driven Economy, which is developing so fast and performing very well.’
Prof. Dr Thomas Dohmen from the Institute for Applied Microeconomics, University of Bonn, Germany is to deliver an honorary lecture at the upcoming April Academic Conference at HSE University April 9 – 12. HSE News Service spoke with Dr. Dohmen about his work on the Global Preferences Survey (GPS), an international survey of epic proportions that he helped develop and analyze in order to learn whether individuals differ in terms of economic preferences by country, and more.
During the XX April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development, scheduled this year for April 9-12 at the Higher School of Economics, Dr David Garcia of the Complexity Science Hub Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna, Austria will present a report entitled ‘The digital traces of collective emotion’ at a session on ‘The Wellbeing of Children and Youth in the Digital Age.’ Ahead of the conference, Dr Garcia spoke with the HSE News Service about his conference presentation, his research, and plans for ongoing collaboration with HSE colleagues.
Seniors in Russia are not responsive to public promotion of healthy living. Their behaviours follow eight different patterns, and a healthy lifestyle is far from being the most popular one. Only 17% of elderly people live what can be termed a 'healthy' lifestyle, Elena Selezneva discovered. The results of the study were presented at the XIX April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development at HSE.
The report entitled ‘Twelve Solutions for New Education’, prepared by the Higher School of Economics and the Centre for Strategic Development, was presented at the XIX April International Academic Conference. Professors Martin Carnoy and Tomasso Agasisti, international experts on education and conference guests, have shared their views on the issues and initiatives highlighted in the report.
One of the roundtables held during the XIX April Academic Conference featured a discussion of the report on morphology of Russian cities presented by Robert Buckley, Senior Fellow in the Graduate Program in International Affairs at The New School, US. The report looked at what Russian cities look like in terms of population density, how the patterns Russian cities exhibit compare with those of other cities around the world, and what individual behaviours might have contributed to the appearance of a certain pattern.
The notion that Karl Marx's works have been studied inside and out is fundamentally incorrect. The huge body of his manuscripts has still not been completely processed, and his seminal work, Capital, was only recently published with the final edits of the author. The 19th April Conference at the Higher School of Economics included the section ‘Methodology of Economic Science’ which was devoted to the work of the German philosopher and political scientist. Independent researcher and professor from Berlin, Thomas Kuczynski, gave a presentation at the conference which pointed out numerous aspects of Marx’s continuous rethinking of allegedly fixed truths.
During a plenary session of the HSE XIX April International Academic Conference, participants discussed the technological future of the Russian economy and how it relates to objectives such as speeding up economic growth and improving the quality of life.
These days, no scientific research is carried out without the use of digital media for the production or dissemination of knowledge. The term ‘Digital Humanities’ reflects this process and constitutes a scientific field where humanists not only aim to use a certain software, but also to understand research using quantitative semantics. However, digital infrastructures are not the same globally. In her talk at the HSE April International Academic Conference Dr Gimena del Rio Riande addressed various issues that arise in connection with digital humanities.
Slower GDP growth rates over the last several years were brought about by changes on international markets and the exhaustion of transformational bonuses due to the transition from a planned economy to a market economy, and this slowdown proves the necessity of looking for new solutions for stimulating the economy. The authors of the paper ‘Structural Changes in the Russian Economy and Structural Policy’ conducted a large-scale analysis on structural policy in Russia and around the world, as well as on possible ways for this policy to develop further. The first presentation of the paper took place as part of the plenary session called ‘Structural Policy in Russia: New Conditions and a Possible Agenda,’ which closed out HSE’s XIX April International Academic Conference.
The winner of the 2018 award is Ina Ganguli, Professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The American researcher stood out for her series of articles analysing the productivity of Russian scientists in the 1990s, as well as their decisions concerning emigration and the impact that emigration had on the diffusion of Russian science in the United States.