Businesses Benefit from Board Members’ Diverse Experiences
HSE researchers have assessed the influence of board members’ work experience diversity on a company’s economic performance. Who makes a better board member—company veterans or outsiders? Their findings have been published in the Russian Management Journal.
A company’s board of directors is generally responsible for making key strategic decisions, setting objectives and outlining areas of development, as well as directing management, identifying risks and addressing them appropriately. The board helps to prevent an authoritarian management style, facilitates a smooth takeover when a new CEO is appointed, and preserves stability and lowers the risk of the business collapsing if its founder resigns. It is assumed that having a diverse range of experience in the board of directors allows it to assess situations from different angles and make more considered decisions. But is this really the case? Is it possible to assess this factor’s contribution to a company’s success and uncover the optimal ‘combinations of experience’ in a board to maximize the benefit to the company?
The authors of the research used data from a survey of 602 private Russian companies managed by a board of directors. Respondents were asked to report which of nine types of work experience their directors had over the past decade: within the company or group of related companies, in other companies in the same industry or other industries, in government bodies (authorities of various levels, law enforcement agencies), and in science, education, or politics. The first type of work experience is thought to provide the deepest insight into a company or industry’s performance. People with experience working for government bodies are often employed by enterprises that communicate with public officials and authorities on a regular basis, while work experience in science or politics is valued by companies that organize large numbers of people to tackle general tasks.
The researchers also proposed and calculated a diversity index for every company. The value of the index is based on the number and combination of different types of work experience among a company’s directors. The economists also developed several additional indices to characterize the number of experience types. They used two common values to evaluate a company’s efficiency: the return on ordinary shareholders’ equity and the return on long-term funds (ie capital, including long-term liabilities), as well as their deviations from the sector average in the relevant industry.
The responses showed that the boards of directors of most entities (84%) are comprised of people who have previously been employed by the same company (46.5% of the companies are run by a board of ‘in-company’ directors). The second and third most common work experience is gained within the group of related companies and in other companies in the same industry (20.6% and 29.0% of entities respectively). The rarest kinds of experience among directors were in law enforcement agencies (0.01%), as well as in science, education, and the socio-political sphere (1.3%). The boards of more than half of the companies consisted of people with only one type of work experience. Another quarter of the companies had boards with two types of experience, and only 25% of the companies were managed by boards with three or more types of work experience. As such, Russian boards of directors can hardly boast a high diversity of experience.
To find out whether the characteristics of a board are related to a company’s economic performance, the researchers proposed a number of mathematical models using different sets of company performance indicators, including diversity. All models confirmed that diversity in executives’ experience significantly improves a company’s efficiency. The higher the diversity index, the bigger the return on shareholders’ equity—even more so if the company’s owners are also its senior managers or chief executive officers. Meanwhile, foreign ownership seems to have a negative impact on the return on shareholders’ equity (possibly due to sanctions). Similarly, diversity of experience also affects the dynamics of capital.
Irina Dergunova, co-author of the article and doctoral student of the Institute for Industrial and Market Studies
This is the first time that data about Russian companies has been used to show a positive correlation between the diversity of a board’s work experience and the efficiency of a company’s performance, and we have obtained meaningful and reliable results. Previous Russian research has examined the influence of separate board characteristics such as directors’ average age, board size, and the number of executives. As far as western European research is concerned, there are relatively few papers containing complex analysis of work experience, and their results are contradictory. Moreover, our research is based on the analysis of a sample of private companies, whereas previous studies have relied primarily on data accumulated from public entities.
Tatyana Dolgopyatova, co-author of the article and Professor at the Faculty of Economic Sciences
'It was interesting to discover that diversity of work experience among board members helps businesses improve their performance. It was equally interesting to learn that there is a higher return on equity in companies whose owners or co-owners are also senior managers there. In other words, a more centralized management structure has a positive effect on a company’s efficiency amid the instability of the Russian economy.'
In order to remain competitive in the labour market, university graduates must be proficient not only in professional knowledge and skills, but also in a set of universal competences (UC). However, higher education systems face problems in assessing such competences due to a lack of developed approaches and methodologies. A report released by the HSE Institute of Education, ‘An Assessment of Universal Competences as Higher Education Learning Outcomes’, analyses the ways in which these challenges have been addressed in both Russia and abroad.
The HSE Graduate School of Business and Rosgeo, Russia’s largest geological exploration holding, have launched a programme in strategic planning and reorganization management, targeted at management teams of a Rosgeo subsidiary.
As part of an agreement signed by HSE University and the State Hermitage in July 2019, the museum will become a partner of HSE–St. Petersburg’s Master’s programme in Arts and Culture Management. Hermitage staff will teach courses in the programme. The agreement also provides for joint projects and student internships at the museum.
Tu Phan is a second-year student in HSE University’s Master’s programme in Strategic Corporate Finance. She is an international student with a lot of experience living abroad: besides Vietnam, she has lived (and studied) in Azerbaijan, Italy, and now Russia. Tu told us about her studies, how her life has changed since moving to Russia, what life is like in the dorms, and even how Russian and Vietnamese babushkas are similar!
Is it possible to learn the Russian language perfectly in a year? Why management is more interesting than physics? What makes Russia an attractive study destination? HSE News Service has talked to Guillerme Gerotto, a second-year undergraduate student from Brazil studying Business Administration at HSE University, about these and other questions.
Airlines use a variety of different methods in order to win their passengers’ loyalty and demonstrate their public prominence. An air company’s social policy, active or indifferent, largely depends on the company’s home region, believes HSE expert Natalia Goncharova. On the basis of her research, the IQ.HSE editorial office determined seven types of global airlines.
HSE offers applicants a large selection of master's programmes in business management and development. Jonathan Linton, Head of the Laboratory for Research in Science and Technology at the Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge (ISSEK) at the Higher School of Economics, discusses the qualities managers and innovators need in today’s world.
As part of the Management session of the XX April International Conference, Carl F. Fey from Aalto University School of Business, Finland, presented his paper on Facilitating Innovation in Companies in Russia: The Role of Organizational Culture. In his talk, Professor Fey spoke about the results of three studies he has been conducting with his team.
Professor Carl Fey from Aalto University has been invited to speak at the 20th Annual April International Academic Conference at HSE Moscow. In his talk, entitled ‘Facilitating Innovation in Companies in Russia: The Role of Organizational Culture’, Professor Fey will present research that he has been conducting with his colleagues on the relationship between organizational culture and innovation.
Abusive supervisors who undermine and bully employees cost U.S. corporations an estimated $24 billion annually. Evgenia Balabanova, Maria Borovik and Veronika Deminskaya are the first researchers to study the problem in Russia.